Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ex-U.P. sales are to be excluded from computing the prescribed minimum of the gross turnover under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: Section 27 of the Act gave statutory effect to the constitutional prohibition in Article 286 of the Constitution of India and used a non obstante clause to take sales outside Uttar Pradesh out of the operation of the Act. As a result, the charging provision, the definition of sale, the definition of turnover, and the minimum turnover proviso to section 3(1) could not be applied so as to include transactions which the Act itself declared to be beyond its reach. The same principle also governed rule 8 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules, which could not be read to enlarge tax liability by including excluded sales in gross turnover. The earlier Supreme Court pronouncement on non-liability to tax supported exclusion of such sales from the computation of turnover for assessment purposes.
Conclusion: Ex-U.P. sales were not to be included in the turnover for determining liability under the minimum turnover proviso, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Sales effected outside Uttar Pradesh were to be ignored for the purpose of deciding whether the dealer crossed the taxable threshold under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute by a non obstante clause expressly excludes certain sales from its operation, those sales cannot be counted in turnover for determining tax liability or the minimum taxable threshold.