Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods purchased by the dealer were to be classified as timber or firewood for sales tax purposes.
Analysis: The classification depended on the manner in which the commodity was generally known in the market and among the public. The Board of Revenue's finding that the cut-ends were timber was supported by the admitted facts, including the dealer's use of the wood as raw material for manufacture and the absence of reliable proof that the goods were firewood. A certificate from the Forest Department was held to be of no significance for sales tax classification because it did not state the basis on which the distinction was made and did not determine the commodity's commercial identity.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be timber and not firewood, and the appeal failed.