<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153167</link>
    <description>Goods classification for sales tax turned on their commercial identity and how the commodity was generally known in the market and among the public. The Board of Revenue&#039;s view that the cut-ends were timber was supported by the admitted facts, including the dealer&#039;s use of the wood as raw material for manufacture and the lack of reliable proof that the goods were firewood. A Forest Department certificate was treated as having no significance for tax classification because it did not explain the basis of the distinction or determine the commodity&#039;s commercial character. The goods were classified as timber, not firewood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153167</link>
      <description>Goods classification for sales tax turned on their commercial identity and how the commodity was generally known in the market and among the public. The Board of Revenue&#039;s view that the cut-ends were timber was supported by the admitted facts, including the dealer&#039;s use of the wood as raw material for manufacture and the lack of reliable proof that the goods were firewood. A Forest Department certificate was treated as having no significance for tax classification because it did not explain the basis of the distinction or determine the commodity&#039;s commercial character. The goods were classified as timber, not firewood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>