Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee discharged the burden under section 7-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act to show that the goods had already suffered tax at the point of first purchase and were therefore not liable to tax as second sales.
Analysis: Section 7-A casts the burden on the dealer to show that the sale or purchase is not liable to tax or is taxable at a reduced rate. The assessee furnished detailed particulars of the purchases, including the names and addresses of the sellers, bill numbers, dates, quantities and amounts, and claimed that the goods were second sales. Once such primary information was produced, the assessing authority was required to verify its correctness if it doubted the claim. No effective enquiry or verification was made, and the material furnished by the assessee was not rebutted. On that basis, the Board of Revenue's view that the burden had not been discharged was held to be erroneous.
Conclusion: The assessee had discharged the burden under section 7-A, and the order revising the assessment was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee furnishes sufficient particulars to show that the goods are not exigible as first sales, the assessing authority cannot reject the claim for want of discharge of burden without making reasonable verification of the information supplied.