Regular bail for an undertrial was granted after completion of investigation, slow trial progress, and no credible flight risk.

Investigation having been completed and challan filed, the Court held that continued pre-trial detention was unwarranted where the trial had only just begun, many prosecution witnesses remained to be examined, and there was no credible showing that the undertrial would abscond or interfere with evidence. The petitioner had already spent substantial time in custody and was not shown to be involved in any other case. On those facts, regular bail was granted subject to bail and surety conditions to protect the fair progress of the trial.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in view of the stage of investigation, the progress of trial, the period of custody, and the absence of a demonstrated risk of absconding or interference with evidence.

Analysis: The petitioner's arrest was followed by completion of investigation and presentation of challan. The trial had only just commenced, with a large number of prosecution witnesses still to be examined, indicating that its conclusion would take time. The materials placed before the Court did not show any tangible likelihood of the petitioner absconding or tampering with evidence. The petitioner had already undergone substantial incarceration as an undertrial and was not shown to be involved in any other case. In these circumstances, further detention was found unwarranted pending trial.

Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the petitioner, subject to bail and surety bonds and the conditions imposed by the Court.

Final Conclusion: Continued pre-trial detention was held unnecessary on the facts, and the petitioner was released on regular bail with protective conditions to secure the fair progress of the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is complete, trial is likely to take considerable time, and no credible risk of absconding or witness interference is shown, further custodial detention of an undertrial is not justified and regular bail may be granted.

---