Interpretation of Tax Law on Intestate Estates: Executor vs. Administrator Clarified

The court held that Section 168 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not applicable to income from the estates of persons who have died intestate. The extended definition of "executor" in the Explanation to Section 168 is intended to apply only to the de facto administrator of the estate of a deceased person who died testate. The court clarified that the provision is not meant to cover estates of persons who died intestate, emphasizing the distinction between the terms "executor" and "administrator" in the context of the statute.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Scope of Section 168 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Applicability of Section 168 to estates of deceased persons who died intestate.
3. Interpretation of the term "executor" in the context of Section 168.

Summary:

1. Scope of Section 168 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The primary issue concerns the true scope of Section 168 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically whether its application is confined to the income of estates of deceased persons who died testate or extends to those who died intestate. Section 168, found in Chapter XV titled "Liability in special cases" under the heading "Executors," deals with the income of the undistributed estate of a deceased person, making it chargeable to tax in the hands of the executor(s). The section is captioned "executors," indicating that the assessable person is the executor, and if there are multiple executors, they are to be assessed as an association of persons.

2. Applicability of Section 168 to Estates of Deceased Persons Who Died Intestate:
The reference was necessitated by conflicting interpretations by two Division Benches of this court regarding the words "or other person administering the estate of a deceased person" in the Explanation to Section 168. One Division Bench held that Section 168 is applicable only to income of estates of deceased persons who died testate, while another held that it also applies to estates of persons who died intestate. The court clarified that the intention to apply this provision only to income from estates of those who died testate is evident from the caption "executor," references to specific legatees, and the scheme of the provision, which contemplates the existence of an estate that must be administered according to a will.

3. Interpretation of the Term "Executor" in the Context of Section 168:
The term "executor" includes an administrator or other person administering the estate of a deceased person. The court noted that while there can be no executor without a will, the existence of a will is not a pre-condition for the appointment of an administrator. Estates of persons dying intestate can also be subjected to administration, and administrators appointed by a court in such cases are assessable u/s 160(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act as representative assessees. The court emphasized that the words "or other person administering the estate" in the Explanation to Section 168 are intended to apply to persons administering the estate of a deceased person who has left a will but did not name an executor, and in respect of whose will it is not necessary to obtain letters of administration.

The court concluded that Section 168 of the Income-tax Act is inapplicable to income from the estates of persons who have died intestate. The extended definition of "executor" given in the Explanation to Section 168 is only intended to apply to the de facto administrator of the estate of a deceased person who has died testate. The other questions referred on the assumption that Section 168 applies even in cases of intestacy were answered in the negative.

---