Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the condition in section 249(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring payment of tax on returned income before admission of appeal, applies to an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B.
Issue (i): Whether the condition in section 249(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring payment of tax on returned income before admission of appeal, applies to an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B.
Analysis: The provision was traced to its legislative background and read as a restriction specifically attached to appeals before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or Commissioner (Appeals). The structure of Chapter XX was treated as compartmentalised, with separate parts governing different appellate forums. The Tribunal held that the legislature did not extend the admission bar in section 249(4) to appeals before the Appellate Tribunal, and that neither equity nor departmental convenience could enlarge the statute beyond its text and scheme.
Conclusion: The requirement in section 249(4) did not govern appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. The preliminary objection to maintainability failed and the assessee succeeded on this legal issue.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal declined to apply the pre-admission payment condition to its own appellate jurisdiction, but it refused stay of recovery on the facts and circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory pre-condition for admission of appeal applies only to the appellate forum expressly named by the legislature and cannot be extended to another appellate forum by implication or considerations of equity.