Tax confidentiality provisions do not bar court-compelled production where the statute lacks an express exclusion of evidence.

Section 25 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 was construed as creating confidentiality only for specified tax particulars and as barring voluntary disclosure by departmental officers. Because it omits any express prohibition on courts compelling production and omits a penal disclosure provision, the section was held not to make the documents inadmissible or irrelevant in evidence. The court also accepted that partners of a firm could obtain and waive confidentiality in relation to applications filed for the assessee. On that construction, certified copies of the sales tax applications were admissible and the direction to produce the originals was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether section 25 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 merely makes specified particulars confidential and prohibits voluntary disclosure, or whether it also renders the documents inadmissible in evidence and bars the court from compelling their production; and whether certified copies of the sales tax applications were admissible in evidence.

Analysis: Section 25 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act was compared with section 54 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The former was found to have adopted only the part of section 54(1) that directs confidentiality, while omitting the express prohibition against courts requiring production and the penal provision for disclosure. Those omissions were treated as significant, showing that the Legislature intended only to prevent voluntary disclosure by departmental officers and did not intend to exclude relevant material from the court's consideration or restrict the court's power to require production. The earlier income-tax decisions were examined, but the conflicting views under that Act were held not to justify reading into section 25 restrictions that are not there. It was also accepted that, in the case of a partnership assessee, the partners could obtain and waive the confidentiality attached to the applications submitted on behalf of the firm.

Conclusion: Section 25 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act does not make the documents inadmissible or irrelevant and does not prohibit the court from compelling their production; the certified copies were admissible.

Final Conclusion: The revision petitions failed on merits and the orders admitting the documents and directing production of the originals were sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory provision that only declares tax-related particulars confidential, without an express prohibition on court-compelled production or a penal disclosure provision, is ordinarily confined to preventing voluntary disclosure and does not by itself exclude admissibility or bar production in evidence.

---