TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court upholds constitutional amendments, affirms Article 31C validity. Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling Acts petitions dismissed.</h1> <h3>Waman Rao & Ors. Etc. Versus Union of India</h3> The Supreme Court upheld the validity of constitutional amendments including Article 31A and 31B, and Article 31C, stating they did not damage the basic ... Whether Articles 31A(1)(a), 31B and the unamended Article 31C are valid ? Held that:- Appeal dismissed. Learned Chief Justice has held the impugned Act good in its own right. Issues: Validity of constitutional amendments, Article 31A and 31B, Article 31C, Writ Petitions on Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling ActsThe judgment delivered by the Supreme Court addressed several key issues. Firstly, it upheld the validity of the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955, stating that they did not damage the basic structure of the Constitution. The introduction of Article 31A and section 3 of the Fourth Amendment Act were deemed constitutional exercises of Parliament's constituent power. Secondly, the Court analyzed Article 31B, introduced by the First Amendment Act, which provides protection to Acts and Regulations listed in the Ninth Schedule from being deemed void. The judgment clarified that amendments made to the Constitution before April 24, 1973, amending the Ninth Schedule, were valid. However, post-April 24, 1973, amendments to the Ninth Schedule were deemed challengeable if they impacted the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court did not rule on the validity of subsequent amendments but noted that if an Act or Regulation saved by Article 31A or 31C is included in the Ninth Schedule, challenges to the constitutional amendments would be irrelevant. Thirdly, the judgment examined Article 31C, pre-amendment by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, and affirmed its validity in line with the Kesavananda Bharati case. It was held that Article 31C did not harm the essential features of the Constitution. Lastly, the Court dismissed all Writ Petitions and Review Petitions concerning the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling Acts, imposing costs on the petitioners. Writ Petition No. 63 of 1977 was scheduled for a hearing, and detailed reasons for the order were to be provided subsequently.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
