Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on the sale consideration amount directed to be deposited under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, and whether the demand for interest could be sustained.
Analysis: The dispute was covered by an earlier Division Bench decision holding that, where the appropriate authority had passed an order of pre-emptive purchase and the purchasers were compelled to keep the balance consideration available, it would be inequitable to require payment of interest on that amount. That decision was binding on the present Bench. Applying the same principle, the demand for interest on the amount of Rs. 22,50,000 was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The demand of interest was rejected and the writ petition was allowed in favour of the assessee.