1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court quashes property acquisition in Safdarjung Enclave Extension due to fair market value discrepancies.</h1> The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the acquisition order of a property in Safdarjung Enclave Extension, New Delhi, due to ... Fair market value of the property in question was over the apparent consideration disclosed by 28.5 % - On that basis Appropriate Authority proceeded to acquire the property for the UOI, rejecting the explanation offered by the transferor - value, of the property either with reference to the apparent consideration or the f.m.v. determined by the Appropriate Authority is not of such magnitude as to call for any interference - HC is justified in setting aside the order for pre emptive purchase The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court regarding the acquisition of a property in Safdarjung Enclave Extension, New Delhi. The Appropriate Authority determined the fair market value of the property to be higher than the disclosed consideration, leading to the property's acquisition for the Union of India. The High Court quashed the acquisition order, and the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no interference was necessary.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
