MRP-based valuation of packaged excisable goods requires statutory conditions for Section 4A; waiver of pre-deposit was refused.

Valuation of packaged excisable goods depended on the statutory conditions for MRP-based assessment under Section 4A rather than on bulk sale alone, following the principle clarified in Jayanti Food Processing. The goods were treated as excisable, packed, notified for Section 4A and subject to MRP declaration requirements, so the dispute did not support valuation under Section 4. The appellants also failed to demonstrate financial hardship. On that basis, no prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out, the direction to deposit the duty demand was sustained, and waiver of penalty and interest remained only until disposal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a dispute concerning valuation of packaged goods under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the impugned goods, being excisable goods sold in packages and required to bear MRP under the relevant law, were liable to valuation under Section 4A rather than under Section 4. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court in Jayanti Food Processing had clarified that the applicability of Section 4A depends on the statutory conditions for retail price-based valuation and not merely on the nature of sale in bulk. On the facts, the goods were considered excisable, packed, notified for Section 4A and subject to MRP declaration requirements. The Tribunal also found that the appellants had not shown financial hardship.

Conclusion: The appellants did not establish a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and the direction to deposit the entire duty demand was sustained, with waiver of penalties and interest only till disposal of the appeal.

---