<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123347</link>
    <description>Valuation of packaged excisable goods depended on the statutory conditions for MRP-based assessment under Section 4A rather than on bulk sale alone, following the principle clarified in Jayanti Food Processing. The goods were treated as excisable, packed, notified for Section 4A and subject to MRP declaration requirements, so the dispute did not support valuation under Section 4. The appellants also failed to demonstrate financial hardship. On that basis, no prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out, the direction to deposit the duty demand was sustained, and waiver of penalty and interest remained only until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:14:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 690 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123347</link>
      <description>Valuation of packaged excisable goods depended on the statutory conditions for MRP-based assessment under Section 4A rather than on bulk sale alone, following the principle clarified in Jayanti Food Processing. The goods were treated as excisable, packed, notified for Section 4A and subject to MRP declaration requirements, so the dispute did not support valuation under Section 4. The appellants also failed to demonstrate financial hardship. On that basis, no prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out, the direction to deposit the duty demand was sustained, and waiver of penalty and interest remained only until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>