Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether button cells imported in bulk and non-retail packing were liable to additional duty of customs on the basis of retail sale price under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with the Standards of Weights and Measures law.
Analysis: The imported button cells were found to have been cleared in cartons containing shrink-wrapped packages and were not in retail packs. The controlling circulars clarified that section 4A valuation applies only where the Standards of Weights and Measures law or the rules made thereunder require declaration of retail sale price on the package, and that such liability arises only for pre-packed commodities sold in retail packages. The definition of commodity in packaged form did not justify MRP-based assessment for goods imported in bulk packing. The departmental finding that the goods were not in retail packing supported the assessee's case.
Conclusion: The imported button cells were not assessable to CVD on the basis of retail sale price, and the demand of differential duty was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the impugned demand, interest, and penalty did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: MRP-based valuation under section 4A applies only when the goods are required, under the relevant standards law, to declare retail sale price on retail packages of pre-packed commodities; bulk or non-retail packed imports are outside that valuation regime.