Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2010 (5) TMI 686 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on enhanced profit, rejects revenue's argument. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on the enhanced profit of Rs. 8,26,90,888, inclusive of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal allows deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on enhanced profit, rejects revenue's argument.

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on the enhanced profit of Rs. 8,26,90,888, inclusive of disallowed expenses under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and binding precedents in profit computation for deductions under Chapter VI-A, rejecting the revenue's argument that disallowed expenses cannot be considered as operational profits from the housing project.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source.
                          3. Computation of profits for the purpose of Section 80-IB(10) after disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act:
                          The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in building and developing housing projects, claimed a deduction under Section 80-IB(10) for the assessment year 2006-07. The profits from the housing project "Shivdarshan Co-op. Hsg. Society" were shown as Rs. 3,76,78,403, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the AO disallowed certain expenses amounting to Rs. 4,50,12,485 under Section 40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of tax, thereby adding this amount to the total income. The AO allowed the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) only on the originally claimed profit of Rs. 3,76,78,403, not on the enhanced profit after disallowance.

                          2. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source:
                          The AO disallowed expenses related to construction, consultancy, architect fees, commission, and professional charges totaling Rs. 4,50,12,485 under Section 40(a)(ia) as the assessee failed to deduct tax at source on these payments. This disallowed amount was added back to the net profit, resulting in a gross total income of Rs. 8,26,90,888. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the disallowed expenditure cannot be considered as profits derived from the industrial undertaking for the purpose of Section 80-IB(10).

                          3. Computation of profits for the purpose of Section 80-IB(10) after disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia):
                          The Tribunal addressed whether the profits for the purpose of Section 80-IB(10) should be computed after considering the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal referred to Section 80AB, which mandates that the income derived from the eligible business must be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act, specifically Sections 30 to 43D. Hence, the disallowed expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) should be added back to the profits, resulting in an enhanced profit eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB(10).

                          The Tribunal cited several judgments, including CIT v. Albright Morarji & Pandit Ltd., Grasim Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT, and Plastibends India Ltd. v. Addl. CIT, to support the view that the computation of profits for deductions under Chapter VI-A should follow the provisions of Sections 30 to 43D. The Tribunal also discussed the Supreme Court's judgment in Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT, which emphasized that the total income must be computed in accordance with the other provisions of the Act before considering the specific deduction sections.

                          The Tribunal rejected the revenue's argument that disallowed expenses cannot be considered as operational profits derived from the housing project. The Tribunal held that the statutory provisions require the computation of profits to include both deductions and disallowances as per Sections 30 to 43D. Therefore, the enhanced profits after disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should be eligible for deduction under Section 80-IB(10).

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on the enhanced profit of Rs. 8,26,90,888, which includes the disallowed expenses under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions and binding precedents in the computation of profits for deductions under Chapter VI-A.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found