<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 686 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on the enhanced profit of Rs. 8,26,90,888, inclusive of disallowed expenses under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and binding precedents in profit computation for deductions under Chapter VI-A, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that disallowed expenses cannot be considered as operational profits from the housing project.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 686 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) on the enhanced profit of Rs. 8,26,90,888, inclusive of disallowed expenses under Section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and binding precedents in profit computation for deductions under Chapter VI-A, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that disallowed expenses cannot be considered as operational profits from the housing project.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>