Unregistered dealer invoices cannot pass Modvat credit; duty demand and penalty sustained for invalid invoicing.

Invoices issued by an unregistered dealer were not valid documents for passing Modvat credit under the excise scheme. Because the assessee used such invalid invoices while clearing duty-paid goods, the authorities treated the duty collected from customers as impermissible and sustained both duty demand and penalty. The findings of the adjudicating and appellate authorities were left undisturbed, as no material illegality or irregularity was shown. The appeal therefore failed and the lower orders were upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether invoices issued by an unregistered dealer under the Modvat scheme could validly pass credit and justify demand of duty and penalty.

Analysis: The assessee cleared duty-paid goods on invoices issued under Rule 57G and Rule 57T, while not being a registered dealer under the applicable excise rules. The invoices were therefore not valid documents for passing Modvat credit. The adjudicating authority and the appellate authority had also found that duty had been collected from customers on an impermissible basis, and that the demand and penalty followed from the illegal use of such invoices. No material irregularity or illegality in those findings was established.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee. The demand of duty and the penalty were upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order of the lower authorities was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Invoices issued by a person who is not a registered dealer cannot be treated as valid Modvat documents, and duty collected through such invalid invoicing is recoverable with consequential penalty.

---