https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122469 The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit. The appellant's appeal against the rejection by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) regarding contravention of Central Excise Rules was rejected. The appellant's contentions on passing Modvat credit illegally and imposition of duty and penalty were not upheld. The appellant's arguments on the validity of invoices issued under Rule 57G/57T were deemed invalid. The original adjudicating authority confirmed duty payment and penalty imposition, finding no irregularity. The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to meet the necessary criteria for issuing modvat invoices and lack of registration as a dealer. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122469 The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit. The appellant's appeal against the rejection by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) regarding contravention of Central Excise Rules was rejected. The appellant's contentions on passing Modvat credit illegally and imposition of duty and penalty were not upheld. The appellant's arguments on the validity of invoices issued under Rule 57G/57T were deemed invalid. The original adjudicating authority confirmed duty payment and penalty imposition, finding no irregularity. The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to meet the necessary criteria for issuing modvat invoices and lack of registration as a dealer. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122469