Rule 173H relief applies where blending rejected goods does not create a new excisable product

Processing rejected excisable goods received back from customers by blending them with another grade of the same product did not amount to manufacture of a new excisable product where the goods remained sodium carboxy methyl cellulose in altered grade only. The note states that the material was duly received back and accounted for under Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and that remaking or similar processing remained within the rule so long as it did not create a distinct product from the original goods. On that basis, fresh duty and penalty were not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether blending rejected goods received back from customers with another grade of the same excisable product amounted to remanufacture so as to deny the benefit of Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and fasten duty on the cleared goods.

Analysis: The rejected material was received back under Rule 173H and was duly accounted for in the records. The goods cleared after processing remained sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, though in a different grade. The reasoning treated the change in grade as insufficient to create a new excisable product, and held that the blending process amounted only to permitted remaking or similar processing. The cited Tribunal decisions were relied upon for the principle that where the process does not result in a new product distinct from the basic goods, the facility under Rule 173H is available and the mere possibility of a remanufacturing characterization does not, by itself, defeat the rule.

Conclusion: The process was covered by Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and did not amount to manufacture of a new product; the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order confirming duty was set aside with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, processing of duty-paid rejected goods received back for blending, remaking, or similar treatment does not attract fresh duty unless the process results in a new excisable product distinct from the original goods.

---