Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty and penalty demanded against the assessee should be stayed and recovery waived at the interim stage on the basis of the assessee's claim that the returned copper rods were reprocessed under Rule 173H and, alternatively, that Modvat credit would neutralise the duty liability.
Analysis: The assessee's case was that the rejected copper rods had been brought back under D-3 declarations and reprocessed, while the Department maintained that the process amounted to manufacture and did not fall within Rule 173H. The Tribunal recorded a prima facie view that, even if the activity were treated as manufacture, duty-paid copper rods used in the remanufacture would attract Modvat credit, thereby reducing the effective duty to nil.
Outcome: Stay granted and recovery of the duty and penalty waived at the interim stage; the confiscated plant and machinery was directed not to be disposed of and normal production was not to be interfered with.