Overseas bank deposits of own funds: interest treated as non-business income for s.80HHC export deduction calculation

Interest earned on deposits of the assessee's own funds with an overseas bank branch was held not to form part of "business profits" for computing deduction under s. 80HHC, as it lacked a direct nexus with export business operations. The HC reasoned that the deposit was made for the assessee's convenience to earn higher interest and was not a mandatory condition for availing credit facilities; the fact that interest paid on borrowings is allowable business expenditure did not convert the deposit interest into business income. Only where a deposit is a pre-condition inextricably linked to carrying on business could such interest be treated as business income. The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue, against the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
- Interpretation of section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the exclusion of interest income for deduction calculation purposes.

Analysis:
The High Court of MADRAS considered the issue of whether interest income should be excluded for the purpose of calculating the deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a firm engaged in the export of tanned and finished leather, had received interest on deposits made with an overseas branch of a bank. The Assessing Officer and Commissioner denied the claim that the interest income should be treated as part of the business income. However, the Tribunal upheld the claim. The Tribunal based its decision on a letter from the bank indicating a link between the deposits and the facilities enjoyed by the assessee. The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's view, emphasizing that the interest income from deposits was not directly linked to the business activities. The deposits were made for the benefit of the assessee to earn additional income, separate from the business operations funded by loans from the bank at lower interest rates.

The Court highlighted that interest paid to the bank was a business expenditure, but interest received on deposits was not part of the business income. The Court distinguished cases where deposits were essential for running the business, such as security deposits for utilities. The Court rejected the assessee's argument that income, even if computed under a different head, should retain the character of business income. Citing precedents, the Court emphasized that the true nature of income determines its classification, not the assessee's claim. The Court also distinguished a Supreme Court decision involving an electricity company, where interest income was directly linked to statutory requirements for the business, unlike the present case where the deposits were not a statutory condition for business operations.

Ultimately, the High Court ruled against the assessee, upholding the Revenue's position that interest income from deposits should not be considered part of the business income for the purpose of calculating the deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---