<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 74 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12171</link>
    <description>Interest earned on deposits of the assessee&#039;s own funds with an overseas bank branch was held not to form part of &quot;business profits&quot; for computing deduction under s. 80HHC, as it lacked a direct nexus with export business operations. The HC reasoned that the deposit was made for the assessee&#039;s convenience to earn higher interest and was not a mandatory condition for availing credit facilities; the fact that interest paid on borrowings is allowable business expenditure did not convert the deposit interest into business income. Only where a deposit is a pre-condition inextricably linked to carrying on business could such interest be treated as business income. The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue, against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 74 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12171</link>
      <description>Interest earned on deposits of the assessee&#039;s own funds with an overseas bank branch was held not to form part of &quot;business profits&quot; for computing deduction under s. 80HHC, as it lacked a direct nexus with export business operations. The HC reasoned that the deposit was made for the assessee&#039;s convenience to earn higher interest and was not a mandatory condition for availing credit facilities; the fact that interest paid on borrowings is allowable business expenditure did not convert the deposit interest into business income. Only where a deposit is a pre-condition inextricably linked to carrying on business could such interest be treated as business income. The issue was decided in favour of the Revenue, against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>