Tribunal Allows Late Orders but Annuls Some; Upholds Interest Subject to Re-computation in Partial Appeal Win.

The Tribunal dismissed the plea of limitation, allowing orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) beyond four years. On merits, it annulled the orders u/s 201(1) for the financial years 1986-87 to 1991-92, favoring the assessee. However, it upheld the interest levied u/s 201(1A), subject to re-computation, partially allowing both parties' appeals.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Plea of Limitation
2. Merits of Orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A)

Summary:

Plea of Limitation:
The assessee contended that the orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) for financial years 1986-87 to 1991-92, passed on 5-6-1996, were barred by limitation as they were issued more than four years after the end of the financial year. The assessee cited several Tribunal decisions to argue that a reasonable time limit of four years should be read into these provisions. The revenue countered that no statutory time-limit is prescribed for passing such orders, and thus, they could be passed at any time, relying on judgments from the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court and other authorities.

The Tribunal considered the conflicting views and observed that while some Tribunal decisions supported the assessee's contention, the factual background in the present case was different. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer acted promptly upon discovering the facts and that no unreasonable delay occurred. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation, stating that the orders could not be annulled merely because they were made beyond four years from the end of the financial year.

Merits of Orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A):
On the merits, the Tribunal addressed the orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) for the financial years in question. Both parties agreed that the issues and arguments were the same as those presented in the assessee's appeals for the financial year 1992-93. Following the findings in those appeals, the Tribunal held that the orders u/s 201(1) made by the Assessing Officer should be cancelled. However, the levy of interest u/s 201(1A) was upheld for each assessment year, subject to re-computation in accordance with the directions given in the earlier order.

Conclusion:
- The assessee's appeals regarding orders u/s 201(1) were allowed.
- The revenue's appeals regarding orders u/s 201(1) were dismissed.
- The appeals of both the assessee and the revenue regarding orders u/s 201(1A) were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---