Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible to the manufacturer on duty paid by the job worker on intermediate products received back after processing under Rule 57F(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Inputs were sent to the job worker under Rule 57F(4) for processing into intermediate products, and the job worker manufactured and returned those products on payment of central excise duty. The rule permits removal of inputs to a job worker for operations necessary for manufacture of the final product or intermediate products, and does not prohibit the job worker from adding his own materials or paying duty on the intermediate product. Since the duty had in fact been paid at the intermediate stage, the manufacturer of the final product was entitled to take credit of that duty, and no prejudice to the Revenue was shown.
Conclusion: Modvat credit of the duty paid by the job worker on the intermediate products was admissible to the assessee.