Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit taken on inputs sent under job-work challans was required to be reversed when the processed PCB assemblies were returned on payment of duty and the overall transaction was revenue neutral.
Analysis: The inputs were admittedly sent under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules for processing, and the components were fitted into PCB assemblies which were received back by the manufacturer for use in the final product. The duty paid by the job workers on the value attributable to the supplied inputs did not negate the character of the movement as job work. In such a situation, the manufacturer remained entitled to Cenvat credit on the inputs as well as on the duty paid on the processed goods, and any reversal under Rule 3(5) would only be offset by the credit available under Rule 3(6). The demand therefore did not result in any revenue loss and the finding of revenue neutrality supported rejection of the demand.
Conclusion: Reversal of Cenvat credit was not warranted, and the demand was unsustainable; the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside in favour of the assessee.