Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Pre-printed serial numbers crucial for Modvat credit under Rule 52A(6) of Central Excise Rules</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus SPECTRA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus SPECTRA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. - 2009 (235) E.L.T. 795 (H. P.) Issues Involved:1. Whether the requirement of printing the serial number on the invoice as provided under Rule 52A(6) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, is a statutory requirement for availing benefit under the Modvat Scheme.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Statutory Requirement of Pre-printed Serial Number on Invoice:The core issue revolves around whether the serial number on the invoice must be pre-printed to avail Modvat credit under Rule 52A(6) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing computer monitors, availed Modvat credit based on an invoice where the serial number was handwritten. This was deemed a contravention of Rules 52A and 57A, leading to a show-cause notice and subsequent recovery order by the Deputy Commissioner, which included a penalty and interest.2. Tribunal's Findings:The Customs, Excise, and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the substantive benefit of Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the serial number was handwritten. The Tribunal viewed this as a technical lapse, not a serious offense, and consistent with its previous decisions.3. Legal Provisions and Notifications:Rule 52A(6) and Notification dated 16-11-1995 mandate that the invoice details, including the serial number, must be pre-printed. The notification explicitly prohibits rubber stamping and any deviation from this procedure is considered a violation. Rule 57GG also requires specific details to be pre-printed on the invoice, emphasizing the importance of pre-printed information to prevent fraud and double credits.4. Purpose of the Notification:The notification aims to curb fraudulent practices such as taking double credits against a single consignment by falsifying documents. The stringent requirement for pre-printed details is a measure to detect and prevent such frauds, as highlighted by Circular No. 68/68/94-CX.5. Interpretation of 'Pre-print':The term 'pre-print' means to print in advance. The statutory requirement is clear and unambiguous, necessitating that certain particulars, including the serial number, must be pre-printed to comply with Rule 57G and Rule 52A.6. Compliance with Statutory Provisions:The court emphasized that compliance with the statutory provisions is mandatory and not merely procedural. The legislative intent behind these provisions is to ensure strict adherence to prevent fraud. The requirement for pre-printed invoices is fundamental and non-compliance renders the invoice invalid for availing Modvat credit.7. Relevant Case Law:The court referred to the Supreme Court decision in Indian Aluminium Company Limited v. Thane Municipal Corporation, which underscores the necessity of fulfilling procedural requirements of law. The court also distinguished the present case from Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd. v. Union of India, where procedural lapses were deemed non-fatal, asserting that the current statutory requirements are mandatory.8. Disagreement with Other Judgments:The court respectfully disagreed with the Rajasthan High Court's decision in J.K. Industries Ltd. v. Union of India, which suggested that lapses by the dealer should not disqualify the assessee from credit. The court reiterated that even procedural requirements must be strictly complied with, as held in Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd.Conclusion:The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in allowing Modvat credit based on handwritten serial numbers. The statutory and notification requirements are mandatory, and non-compliance invalidates the claim for Modvat credit. Consequently, the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal were set aside, and the question of law was answered affirmatively, reinforcing the necessity of pre-printed serial numbers on invoices for availing Modvat credit.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found