<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 431 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112990</link>
    <description>Rule 57F(4) permits inputs to be sent to a job worker for processing into intermediate products, and it does not prevent the job worker from using additional materials or paying central excise duty on the intermediate product. Where duty is actually paid on the intermediate goods before return, the manufacturer of the final product may take Modvat credit of that duty, and no Revenue prejudice is shown on those facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 431 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112990</link>
      <description>Rule 57F(4) permits inputs to be sent to a job worker for processing into intermediate products, and it does not prevent the job worker from using additional materials or paying central excise duty on the intermediate product. Where duty is actually paid on the intermediate goods before return, the manufacturer of the final product may take Modvat credit of that duty, and no Revenue prejudice is shown on those facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>