TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Manufacturers liable to pay duty on waste & scrap generated despite exports, refund claim rejected.</h1> <h3>DIAMOND TOOLS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUS. & C. EX., RAJKOT</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Central Excise Officer's decision, ruling that the appellants were liable to pay duty on waste and scrap generated during ... Refund - Cenvat/Modvat on inputs - Benefit of Notification No. 16/97-C.E. Issues:1. Applicability of duty on waste and scrap generated during the manufacturing process.2. Entitlement to refund of duty paid on waste and scrap.3. Interpretation of Notifications related to Modvat credit.4. Classification of waste and scrap as a manufactured product or a by-product.Analysis:1. The appellants, a SSI unit engaged in manufacturing Spanners, claimed they were not liable to pay duty on waste and scrap generated during the manufacturing process of final products exported. The Central Excise Officer directed them to pay duty on such waste and scrap, which they did. The appellants sought a refund of the paid duty, arguing that the duty recovery without a demand was improper.2. The appellants contended that they were entitled to the refund as they had availed of Modvat credit on inputs used in manufacturing final products exported. They argued that waste and scrap were by-products and not subject to duty. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the benefit of Notifications was available only if input credit had not been taken. The waste and scrap were considered a necessary incident of the manufacturing process, as per the Supreme Court's judgment in a relevant case.3. The Tribunal noted that the appellants had taken input stage credit, making them liable to pay duty on waste and scrap. The reliance on previous judgments was deemed misplaced as the facts and issues were distinguishable. The department did not require the reversal of credit on inputs but only the payment of the correct duty on waste and scrap generated during the manufacturing process.4. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the lower authorities' orders, dismissing the appeal. The issue of unjust enrichment was not considered due to the decision on the duty liability for waste and scrap. The judgment highlighted the necessity for duty payment on waste and scrap generated during the manufacturing process, even if the final products were exported.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
