<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112604</link>
    <description>Waste and scrap arising during manufacture were held dutiable where Modvat credit had been taken on the inputs used for the exported final products. The exemption notification applied only when such input credit had not been availed, so the refund claim based on that notification was not maintainable. The authorities treated waste and scrap as a normal incident of the manufacturing process and distinguished the cited precedents because the department was seeking duty on the scrap itself, not reversal of input credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112604</link>
      <description>Waste and scrap arising during manufacture were held dutiable where Modvat credit had been taken on the inputs used for the exported final products. The exemption notification applied only when such input credit had not been availed, so the refund claim based on that notification was not maintainable. The authorities treated waste and scrap as a normal incident of the manufacturing process and distinguished the cited precedents because the department was seeking duty on the scrap itself, not reversal of input credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>