Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit for recovery of money was barred by the suspension provision under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 because an inquiry under section 16 was pending before the BIFR, and whether the decree passed by the civil court was without jurisdiction.
Analysis: A reference had been made to the BIFR before the suit was instituted, and the inquiry under section 16 was pending when the recovery suit was filed. The statutory language of section 22(1) bars proceedings for recovery of money against the industrial company while such inquiry is pending unless consent of the Board is obtained. The Act was treated as a complete code with overriding effect, and the civil court's jurisdiction stood excluded in respect of matters covered by the statutory scheme. A decree passed despite the bar of section 22 was therefore a decree passed without jurisdiction and could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The suit was barred by section 22(1) of the Act, and the decree of the civil court was a nullity. The issue was decided in favour of the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The impugned judgment was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with consequential directions regarding the deposited amount and further consideration by the BIFR.
Ratio Decidendi: When an inquiry under section 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is pending, section 22(1) suspends recovery proceedings against the sick industrial company, and any decree passed in disregard of that bar is without jurisdiction and void.