Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the forfeiture of earnest money under the apartment buyer's agreement was justified, and what relief should be granted in the circumstances.
Analysis: The agreement treated a part of the amounts paid as earnest money and permitted forfeiture on non-fulfilment of the allottee's obligations. The respondent had stopped further instalments after paying for several years, relying on alleged escalation in cost and delay in possession. The terms also showed that the company had reserved power to revise costs on specified heads and that the remedy for delay in possession was refund without interest. At the same time, the facts showed delay in handing over possession and a substantial demand of additional amount. Balancing the contractual stipulations with the surrounding circumstances, the appropriate course was not to disturb the forfeiture in full but to grant equitable relief.
Conclusion: The forfeiture was upheld to the extent of 50 per cent of the amount, and the appellant was directed to refund the remaining 50 per cent with interest if payment was delayed beyond the stipulated period.