Court ruling: Not breaching undertaking by filing proceedings to halt payment request. Contempt notice discharged. No costs. The SC ruled in 2004 that filing proceedings in court and requesting a payment not be made does not breach an undertaking. The contempt notice was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court ruling: Not breaching undertaking by filing proceedings to halt payment request. Contempt notice discharged. No costs.
The SC ruled in 2004 that filing proceedings in court and requesting a payment not be made does not breach an undertaking. The contempt notice was discharged, and no costs were ordered.
The Supreme Court of India in 2004 ruled that filing proceedings in court and requesting a payment not be made does not constitute a breach of undertaking. Therefore, the contempt notice was discharged, and no costs were ordered.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.