Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Court should grant sanction under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the composite scheme of amalgamation/demerger submitted by the petitioner company.
Analysis: The petition concerns a scheme providing for transfer of the automobile undertaking and amalgamation, which was considered under sections 391 and 394 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The Court noted the chairman's report under Rule 78 confirming convening and conduct of meetings of shareholders and creditors, and the Registrar of Companies' affidavit stating no objection. The scheme was unanimously approved by the shareholders and creditors in the convened meetings and was found not to be illegal, mala fide, or designed to defeat creditors' or minority shareholders' rights. The Court examined whether any infirmity, illegality, or prejudicial conduct existed and found none, and considered the scheme's administrative and commercial benefits and safeguards for creditors and shareholders.
Conclusion: The Court grants sanction to the proposed composite scheme of amalgamation/demerger under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to sanction by the other High Courts where the other companies are registered.