Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether criminal proceedings against a company and its directors deserved to be quashed when the company had applied for striking off its name under the Companies Act and the department had already moved the matter towards final strike-off under the applicable circular scheme.
Analysis: The petition was founded on the interaction between the scheme for striking off defunct companies and the continuation of prosecution for non-increase of paid-up capital. The company had invoked the statutory exit process, and the reply affidavit ably showed that the application had been favourably considered, newspaper publication had been made, and only the final Gazette publication remained. The statutory scheme under section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956, especially sub-section (5), contemplated that once the prescribed procedure was completed and notice was published, the company would stand dissolved. In that factual setting, continuation of the criminal case was found to be unnecessary and contrary to the course the department itself had adopted under the circular scheme.
Conclusion: The criminal proceedings were not sustainable and were liable to be quashed in favour of the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: When the statutory process for striking off a company's name has been substantially completed and the competent authority has moved towards final dissolution under the governing scheme, continuation of prosecution on the same footing becomes unsustainable and may be quashed.