<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110244</link>
    <description>Substantial completion of the statutory strike-off process may render prosecution against a company and its directors unsustainable where the competent authority has favourably processed the application, completed public notice requirements, and moved towards final dissolution. Under the Companies Act, 1956, the strike-off mechanism contemplated dissolution following completion of the prescribed procedure and publication of notice. Continuation of criminal proceedings for failure to increase paid-up capital was treated as inconsistent with the department&#039;s own action under the applicable circular scheme. The proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110244</link>
      <description>Substantial completion of the statutory strike-off process may render prosecution against a company and its directors unsustainable where the competent authority has favourably processed the application, completed public notice requirements, and moved towards final dissolution. Under the Companies Act, 1956, the strike-off mechanism contemplated dissolution following completion of the prescribed procedure and publication of notice. Continuation of criminal proceedings for failure to increase paid-up capital was treated as inconsistent with the department&#039;s own action under the applicable circular scheme. The proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>