Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned circular could validly clarify that a company employing a whole-time company secretary was not required to obtain a compliance certificate from a company secretary in practice under the proviso to section 383A of the Companies Act, 1956; and whether the respondents should instead consider a general exemption notification under section 637A of the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The validity of the circular was questioned on the footing that it appeared to modify the proviso to section 383A. The respondents took the position that the circular merely corrected an anomaly and reflected the legislative intent, and that a general exemption under section 637A was an alternative course.
Outcome: No final adjudication was recorded on the challenge. Time was sought by the respondent to obtain instructions, and the matter was directed to be taken up on the next date.