Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the products in question were classifiable as patent and proprietary ayurvedic medicines under Heading 3003.39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as goods falling under Heading 3003.10.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the products were manufactured from ingredients described in recognised Ayurvedic texts and were understood in common parlance as ayurvedic medicines. The Revenue did not dispute that the ingredients were taken from Ayurvedic text books specified in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The classification issue was covered by the earlier Tribunal decision holding that products based exclusively on ingredients mentioned in ayurvedic text books and understood in common parlance are to be treated as ayurvedic medicines, and that view had been upheld by the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The products were held to be patent and proprietary ayurvedic medicines, and the Revenue's challenge to their classification failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were rejected and the classification adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was sustained in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A product manufactured from ingredients exclusively found in recognised Ayurvedic texts and understood in common parlance as an ayurvedic preparation is classifiable as a patent and proprietary ayurvedic medicine.