<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 362 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107648</link>
    <description>Products manufactured exclusively from ingredients found in recognised Ayurvedic texts and understood in common parlance as ayurvedic preparations are classifiable as patent and proprietary ayurvedic medicines under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal applied the earlier settled view, already upheld by the Supreme Court, that such products fall within the Ayurvedic medicine entry where their ingredients are drawn from texts listed in the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and their market identity is ayurvedic. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s classification challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 362 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107648</link>
      <description>Products manufactured exclusively from ingredients found in recognised Ayurvedic texts and understood in common parlance as ayurvedic preparations are classifiable as patent and proprietary ayurvedic medicines under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal applied the earlier settled view, already upheld by the Supreme Court, that such products fall within the Ayurvedic medicine entry where their ingredients are drawn from texts listed in the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and their market identity is ayurvedic. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s classification challenge failed and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>