Marketability controls excisability of intermediate products; carded wool classification stood, but marketability and exemptions needed fresh review.

Carded wool arising at the intermediate stage of pressed wool felt manufacture was treated as a manufactured product and goods for excise purposes because tariff nomenclature and HSN guidance indicated that carding creates an identifiable commodity. However, excisability also depends on marketability, and the record did not establish that carded wool or wool laps were actually marketable or comparable to wool tops. The exemption notifications relied upon therefore required fresh factual examination. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration of marketability and the exemption claims after hearing the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether carded wool emerging at the intermediate stage of manufacture of pressed wool felt is a manufactured product and goods for excise purposes. (ii) Whether carded wool is marketable and therefore excisable, and whether the exemption notifications relied upon by the assessee apply.

Issue (i): Whether carded wool emerging at the intermediate stage of manufacture of pressed wool felt is a manufactured product and goods for excise purposes.

Analysis: Carded wool was specifically referred to in the tariff and its character was examined with reference to the HSN description of carding, which explains that the process disentangles fibres and leaves them in the form of webs. On that basis, and following the settled approach that tariff nomenclature and HSN guidance are relevant in resolving classification disputes, the product was treated as having come into existence as an identifiable commodity. The material on record supported the view that the process produced a distinct intermediate product.

Conclusion: Carded wool was held to be goods and a manufactured product.

Issue (ii): Whether carded wool is marketable and therefore excisable, and whether the exemption notifications relied upon by the assessee apply.

Analysis: Marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability, and the record did not contain evidence establishing that the intermediate product was in fact marketable. The authorities below had treated carded wool as comparable to wool tops, but the materials placed before the Tribunal indicated that carded wool or wool laps were distinct from wool tops and were not shown to be bought and sold in the market. The test report was silent on marketability, while the assessee placed an affidavit asserting non-marketability. Since marketability had not been proved, and the applicability of the exemption notifications also required fresh examination on the facts, the matter could not be finally decided on the existing record.

Conclusion: The question of excisability was not finally established on the existing material, and the exemption notifications required reconsideration.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back for fresh examination of marketability and the exemption claims, with a hearing to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: An intermediate product specified in the tariff is not liable to excise unless it is shown to be marketable, and where marketability is not established on the record, the issue must be examined afresh.

---