Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the winding-up petition should be admitted and advertised, in light of the objections regarding the petitioner's locus standi after amalgamation, limitation, acknowledgment of debt, and liability to pay interest.
Analysis: The petitioner was held to have locus standi because, under the amalgamation order, the debts and liabilities of the transferor-company stood transferred to the transferee-company, making it the creditor entitled to recover the dues. The court also treated the respondent's letter on the company letterhead, signed by its Assistant Vice-President (Finance), as a sufficient acknowledgment of liability for limitation purposes. On the materials before it, the court found a prima facie debt and held that the respondent had admitted an unpaid balance despite service of statutory notice. As the matter was at the stage of admission under the Companies (Court) Rules, the court confined itself to whether a case for admission and advertisement was made out.
Conclusion: The petition was held fit for admission, and advertisement was directed to remain deferred for a limited period unless the respondent deposited the admitted amount.