Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is maintainable against the legal heirs of a deceased employee for recovery of company property wrongfully withheld after the employee's death.
Analysis: The earlier view that section 630 did not extend to relatives of an erstwhile employee stood displaced by the Supreme Court's ruling that the provision is attracted where company property is wrongfully retained after the employee's demise. The Court therefore treated the complaint as legally maintainable against the widow of the deceased employee. The contention that the property did not belong to the company was held to be a factual matter to be raised before the trial court and not in a petition for quashing.
Conclusion: The complaint under section 630 was held maintainable against the legal heir of the deceased employee, and the orders dismissing the complaint were quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 lies against the legal heirs of a deceased employee if company property is alleged to be wrongfully withheld after the employee's death.