Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date
Like 0BookmarkPrint or Download

Reversal of ITC─Late filing of Return─Applicability of section 16(4) CGST Act, 2017

Date 09 Apr 2020
Replies2 Replies
Written by
Input tax credit entitlement supersedes late return filing; reversal and retention challenged as unlawful under tax constitutional principles
The article argues that the notwithstanding clause in Section 16(2) makes furnishing of return the operative entitlement condition for Input Tax Credit, so that belated filing or rectification does not forfeit ITC. It treats rules as procedural and lacking power to extinguish a vested credit right, and contends that governmental retention of credit payable to a taxpayer is without legal authority and inconsistent with constitutional tax principles, citing authorities recognising ITC as a vested right. (AI Summary)

Section 16(2)(d) , CGST Act, 2017 starts with notwithstanding clause and stipulates “furnishing of return u/s 39 for entitlement of ITC”. This clause nowhere mentions “timely submission of returns and/or debarring rectification of any return belatedly, for being entitled to avail ITC. The “notwithstanding clause”, in the section 16(2) means that it supersedes[1] all the sub-sections of section 16.

As such, in our view, if a registered person has furnished returns &/or rectified any return belatedly, he is entitled to ITC irrespective of section 16(4)CGST Act, 2017 and his vested right[2] can not be withdrawn in the absence of a clear legal prohibition, by framing rules.

Rules are procedural in nature and can not be construed as a mandatory provisions[3]. The Govt. has no legal authority to retain the amount of credit to which the respondent in the present case is entitled to and retention of it by the Govt., cannot be sustained, being violative of Article 265 of the Constitution of India[4].

In view of the above, in our view, ITC is not required to be reversed.

 

CA Om Prakash Jain

Jaipur

9414300730

[email protected]

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Articles