Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date
Like 0BookmarkPrint or Download

All assesses / dealers who are already registered under existing central excise/service tax/ vat laws - What will happen when turnover is not exceeding ₹ 20 Lakhs (or ₹ 10 Lakhs in Hill areas) - Complications and Problems

Date 11 Apr 2017
Replies8 Replies
Written by
Mandatory GST registration may obligate previously registered dealers to retain provisional registration despite qualifying for threshold exemption.
Section 22(2) mandates that persons registered under existing laws immediately before the appointed day be registered under GST, producing automatic provisional migration; coupled with limited statutory grounds for cancellation and system based migration processes, this creates ambiguity for taxpayers whose turnover falls below the GST exemption threshold and may impede surrender or cancellation of provisional registrations without clear administrative clarification. (AI Summary)

Here, we like highlight the ambiguity between the provisions of the statute and intention of the legislature relating to Registration under the GST regime.

As we know unlike the Service Tax or Central Excise regime, in the GST regime, a person once registered, will be liable to discharge GST liability irrespective of the turnover.

Therefore, the question arises, when the turnover of a person was much below Rs.  20 lakhs (or ₹ 10 lakhs as the case may be), but since he was registered under the existing law (i.e excise, service tax or vat etc.), whether he would be eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from the GST on the basis of turnover?

As per the provisions of the Sub-Section (2) of the Section 22 - Persons liable for registration  of the THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017, for the existing registered assessee, it is mandatory to seek GST registration, as reproduced hereinafter:

(2) Every person who, on the day immediately preceding the appointed day, is registered or holds a licence under an existing law, shall be liable to be registered under this Act with effect from the appointed day.

Therefore, it appears it is mandatory for such persons to have GST registration without any exclusion or exception.

Further Q. 33 (registration) of the FAQs, it is stated that all the existing registration shall be migrated to GSTN automatically and provisional registration no. shall be allotted. If an assessee fails to submit the documents and information as sought by the GSTN, provisional registration so allotted will be cancelled.

As per section 29 of the GST, a person can apply for cancellation of GST registration only in the following circumstances:

(a) the business has been discontinued, transferred fully for any reason including death of the proprietor, amalgamated with other legal entity, demerged or otherwise disposed of; or

(b) there is any change in the constitution of the business; or

(c) the taxable person, other than the person registered under sub-section (3) of section 25, is no longer liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24.

As per the provisions of Section 25(3), a person, though not liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24 may get himself registered voluntarily.

Therefore, a person who is registered under the existing laws (i.e. central excise, service tax, VAT etc.) is  required to obtain without any option since it is not voluntary by virtue of section 22(2) as above.

However, as per the all the information and statements from the Central Government, the persons who has turnover upto 20 lakhs will be out of GST.

Therefore, it is absolute necessary that Central Government must issue suitable clarification in time to avoid unwarranted litigation that may arise since this issue is going to effect lakhs of existing registered persons who otherwise would not be falling within the GST framework.

 

References

Section - 22 - Persons liable for registration  of the THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017

Section - 025 - Procedure for registration  of the THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017

Section - 29 - Cancellation of registration  of the THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017

Draft Rule 12 - Application for cancellation of registration   of the GST - REGISTRATION - Draft Rules 31-3-2017

Q. 23 - Whether Cancellation of Registration Certificate is permissible?  of the FAQ on GST (2nd Edition) dated 31.3.2017

Q. 33 - Whether all assesses / dealers who are already registered under existing central excise/service tax/ vat laws will have to obtain fresh registration?

 

8 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Articles