Section 2(14)(iii) of The Income tax Act provides that 'Agricultural Land' would not be considered as a capital asset and states as under - '.. (iii) agricultural land in India, not being land situated- (a) in any area which is comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality (whether known as a municipality, municipal corporation, notified area committee, town area committee, town committee, or by any other name) or a cantonment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand 47[***]; or (b) in any area within the distance, measured aerially,- (I) not being more than two kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a) and which has a population of more than ten thousand but not exceeding one lakh; or (II) not being more than six kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a) and which has a population of more than one lakh but not exceeding ten lakh; or (III) not being more than eight kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a) and which has a population of more than ten lakh. Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-clause, 'population' means the population according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures have been published before the first day of the previous year' No criterion has been mentioned that for holding a land to be 'agricultural land', agricultural produce must be done on such land and agricultural income should have been derived from such land. Where the land had been shown as agricultural land in Revenue records, there was no application made for conversion of aforesaid agricultural land to non-agricultural land, the agriculture land under consideration was situated beyond 8 km from the municipal limits and other conditions for claiming the said land as agricultural land are satisfied, then the claim u/s 2(14)(iii) cannot be denied on the grounds that the assessee had not performed any agricultural activity on the said land or that the assessee had purchased the said property with the sole intention to sell the same for profit. The same was held in the case of The ITO, Ward-2 (1) (4), Ahmedabad Versus M/s. Meghdeep Farms Pvt. Ltd. And (Vice-Versa) - 2023 (3) TMI 1238 - ITAT AHMEDABAD. A question may be asked that when agricultural land is not a 'capital asset' itself, can the profit on sale of the land be taxed under any other head.. It is to be noted that that there is difference between a receipt not being an income and the same being an exempt income under the tax laws. So any profits made on sale of agricultural land, which is not a capital asset, is not an income at all for tax purpose. Such profit made on sale of such agricultural land is not required to be disclosed in the ITR.
No Capital Gains on Agricultural Land u/s 2(14) even incase the land is not used for earning agricultural income and is sold after purchasing [Sec 2(14) of ITA'61 - Sec 2(22) of ITA'25]
Vivek Jalan
Agricultural land outside prescribed urban limits remains excluded from capital assets despite no cultivation or resale-profit intention. Agricultural land outside the prescribed municipal or cantonment limits and aerial-distance criteria is excluded from capital assets under section 2(14)(iii). Agricultural activity or agricultural income is not a stated condition where revenue records classify the land as agricultural, no conversion to non-agricultural use has occurred, and location requirements are satisfied. Profit on transfer of such land is presented as outside income for tax purposes rather than exempt income and as not requiring disclosure in the income-tax return. (AI Summary)
TaxTMI