Trade in Trouble: The Legal Fallout of Wrong Classification under Customs and GST Laws.

1. Introduction

In the globalised trade environment, classification of goods and services forms the cornerstone of indirect taxation and international customs administration. The correct classification determines the applicable duty, tax rate, exemption eligibility, export incentives, and compliance obligations under both the Customs Act, 1962 and the Goods and Services Tax (GST) laws.

However, wrong classification, whether deliberate or inadvertent, can lead to significant fiscal, penal, and reputational consequences for importers, exporters, and domestic taxpayers. Understanding the legal framework governing classification and the consequences of its misapplication is, therefore, essential for trade compliance and risk management.

2. What is Wrong Classification?

Wrong classification refers to the act of assigning an incorrect tariff heading or subheading to a good or service, thereby leading to erroneous determination of the rate of duty, tax liability, or eligibility for benefits/exemptions.

It may arise due to:

• Misinterpretation of tariff entries or explanatory notes,
• Incorrect application of the General Rules for the Interpretation (GRI) of the Harmonised System, or
• Intentional manipulation to avail of lower duty rates or higher export incentives.

Wrong classification thus constitutes misdeclaration under Customs law and misclassification of supply under GST law, both carrying statutory penalties.

3. Definition and Legal Framework of Classification

3.1. As per WCO (World Customs Organization)

The WCO governs the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS Code) used globally.

• The HS Nomenclature, adopted in 1988, classifies all goods into chapters, headings, and subheadings based on material composition, use, and technological function.
• Classification must follow the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI) issued by WCO.

3.2. As per WTO (World Trade Organization)

Under WTO rules, tariff classification consistency is essential for transparency in trade and compliance with GATT 1994 Article II, ensuring that bound tariff commitments are respected by member countries.

3.3. Under Indian Customs Law

• Governed by the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, aligned with the HSN (Harmonized System Nomenclature) issued by WCO.
• Section 2(26) and 2(25) of the Customs Act, 1962 define “import” and “export”; while Section 12 levies duty on goods classified under the Tariff.
• Correct classification is critical for the determination of applicable Basic Customs Duty, IGST on imports, and eligibility for exemptions.

3.4. Under Indian GST Law

• Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 5 of the IGST Act, 2017 levy tax on supply of goods and services.
• Schedule I to the Customs Tariff Act is adopted for classification of goods under GST.
• Services are classified based on the Service Accounting Code (SAC) system as per Notification No. 11/2017–CT (Rate).
• Misclassification affects GST rate, place of supply, nature of supply (intra/inter-State), and Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility.

4. Importance of Correct Classification

1. Determination of Duty and Tax Liability:
   Correct classification ensures accurate duty/tax payment and prevents future disputes.
2. Eligibility for Exemptions and Incentives:
   Exemption notifications and FTP benefits are often classification-specific.
3. Trade Facilitation and Transparency:
   Uniform classification ensures harmonised treatment across ports and jurisdictions.
4. Compliance with International Commitments:
   Adherence to WCO and WTO classification norms maintains India’s credibility as a trading partner.
5. Legal Certainty and Predictability:
   Accurate classification minimises litigation and protects businesses from retrospective demands.

5. General Rules for the Interpretation (GRI) of the Harmonised System

Classification is guided by six General Rules of Interpretation (GRI), which are legally binding and hierarchical:

1. Rule 1: Classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and relevant Section or Chapter Notes.
2. Rule 2(a): Incomplete or unfinished articles shall be classified as finished articles if they have the essential character.
3. Rule 2(b): Mixtures or combinations of materials shall be classified based on the predominant material.
4. Rule 3: When goods appear classifiable under multiple headings, classification shall follow:
   • (a) Specific over general heading;
   • (b) Essential character; or
   • (c) Last heading in numerical order.
5. Rule 4: If classification cannot be determined under the above rules, classify under heading most akin to the goods.
6. Rule 5 and 6: Cover packaging materials and subheading classification.

Failure to apply these rules systematically often results in wrong classification.

6. Reasons for Adoption of Wrong Classification

• Lack of technical knowledge or tariff interpretation skills.
• Complex or ambiguous product composition.
• Intentional undervaluation or misdeclaration to evade duty or claim higher export incentive.
• Non-alignment between Customs, GST, and DGFT tariff headings.
• Ignorance of recent amendments or judicial pronouncements.
• Reliance on unverified import data or outdated HSN codes.

7. Consequences of Wrong Classification

7.1. Under the Customs Law

1. Demand of Differential Duty:
   Under Section 28 of the Customs Act, duty short-paid due to misclassification can be recovered with interest.
2. Penalty and Confiscation:
   • Section 111(m)– confiscation of goods for misdeclaration in import.
   • Section 113(i) – confiscation for misdeclaration in export.
   • Section 112 / 114A – penalties up to the duty evaded or higher.
3. Prosecution:
   For deliberate evasion, criminal prosecution under Section 135 can be initiated.
4. Cancellation of Authorisation or Export Benefits:
   DGFT may deny or revoke incentives if exports were based on wrong classification.
5. Reputational and Operational Impact:
   Blacklisting, suspension of ICEGATE credentials, and audit scrutiny.

7.2. Under the GST Law

1. Demand and Recovery:
   Under Sections 73 and 74 of CGST Act, tax short-paid due to wrong classification attracts recovery along with interest.
2. Penalties:
   • Section 122(2)– penalty for incorrect tax payment.
   • Section 125 – general penalty for contravention without intent.
3. Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC):
   Wrong classification can result in ITC mismatch or denial, especially when the supply is treated as exempt or non-taxable.
4. Mismatch in Place or Nature of Supply:
   Leads to erroneous payment under CGST/SGST instead of IGST or vice versa.
5. Increased Litigation and Audit Risk:
   Classification disputes are among the most litigated matters before GST Advance Ruling Authorities.

8. Determining the Correct Classification

To ensure proper classification, the following methodology should be applied:

1. Examine Product Composition, Function, and Use.
   Identify the essential character and technical nature of goods or services.
2. Refer to Section and Chapter Notes.
   These notes have statutory force and override headings where applicable.
3. Apply General Rules of Interpretation (GRI).
   Sequentially apply GRI 1–6 for systematic classification.
4. Refer to Explanatory Notes and WCO Opinions.
   Though not legally binding, WCO Explanatory Notes provide persuasive interpretive guidance.
5. Refer to Indian Tariff Notifications and Circulars.
   CBIC circulars and DGFT trade notices clarify classification for specific items.
6. Seek an Advance Ruling:
   Under Section 28H of the Customs Act or Section 96C of the CGST Act, taxpayers can obtain advance rulings for certainty.
7. Judicial Precedents:
   Classification once settled by Supreme Court or CESTAT should be followed unless facts differ materially.

9. Settled Legal Position and Judicial Precedents

1. DUNLOP INDIA LTD. & MADRAS RUBBER FACTORY LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - 1975 (10) TMI 94 - Supreme Court – The Supreme Court held that classification must be determined strictly based on tariff entries and not on trade or commercial parlance alone.
2. ATUL GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE - 1986 (7) TMI 90 - Supreme Court – End-use is relevant only when the tariff heading so stipulates.
3. INDIAN ALUMINIUM CABLES LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA - 1985 (5) TMI 54 - Supreme Court– Common or commercial understanding may be used when tariff heading is ambiguous.
4. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI Versus M/s CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANT (P) LTD., NEW DELHI - 2012 (12) TMI 149 - Supreme Court – Emphasised essential character and predominant material for classification.
5. M/s SRF Ltd., M/s ITC Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, Commissioner of Customs (Import And General), New Delhi - 2015 (4) TMI 561 - Supreme Court – Held that HSN Explanatory Notes have persuasive value for Indian tariff classification.
6. West Bengal State Beverages Corp. v. CCT (2022 SCC OnLine SC 145) – Under GST, classification disputes to be resolved on intrinsic nature and statutory schedule.

10. Way Forward

• Harmonised Interpretation Across Laws:
  A single classification database integrating Customs and GST should be developed.
• Capacity Building:
  Training programs for trade professionals, customs brokers, and GST practitioners on GRI application.
• Technology Integration:
  AI-based tariff classification tools under ICEGATE and GSTN to assist in correct coding.
• Advance Ruling Standardisation:
  Consistency in rulings across states and zones to reduce litigation.
• Transparency and Publication:
  Public availability of CBIC classification rulings and WCO guidance in simplified form.

11. Conclusion

Correct classification of goods and services is not merely a procedural formality—it is the foundation of indirect tax compliance. Errors in classification can result in severe financial exposure, denial of benefits, penalties, and criminal consequences under both Customs and GST frameworks.

Given the increasing globalisation of trade, convergence between WCO standards, Customs Tariff, and GST HSN/SAC becomes vital for consistency. The future of compliance lies in data-driven classification, transparent rulings, and enhanced professional competence, ensuring both trade facilitation and revenue protection for India.

***