Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Comparative Analysis of MOOWR, PLI, SEZ, EOU, STPI, Advance Authorisation and EPCG Schemes.

YAGAY andSUN
Comparing India's MOOWR, PLI, SEZ, EOU, STPI, Advance Authorisation and EPCG schemes: benefits, obligations, legal tradeoffs This comparative analysis reviews India's MOOWR, PLI, SEZ, EOU, STPI, Advance Authorisation and EPCG schemes, contrasting statutory bases, administering authorities, eligibility, compliance, benefits, export-obligations and legal positions. MOOWR offers duty deferment without export obligation; PLI grants sectoral turnover-linked incentives; SEZ/EOU/STPI provide bonded-regime duty/GST advantages with NFE requirements; Advance Authorisation and EPCG permit duty-free/concessional import against export obligations. Key tradeoffs include working-capital relief versus strict EO tracking, sectoral eligibility thresholds, and administrative oversight. Judicial and administrative decisions affirm customs deferment principles, SEZ foreign-territory treatment, and discretionary but reviewable DGFT actions. (AI Summary)

Below is a comprehensive, professionally drafted comparative analysis of the major export-promotion and manufacturing support schemes available under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and allied legislations of India — MOOWR, PLI, SEZ, EOU, STPI, Advance Authorisation Scheme, and EPCG.

1. Introduction

India’s foreign trade regime offers multiple fiscal, customs and policy-driven incentives to promote domestic manufacturing, exports and employment generation. Each of these schemes—MOOWR (Manufacturing and Other Operations in Warehouse Regulations, 2019), Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Schemes, Special Economic Zones (SEZs), Export Oriented Units (EOUs), Software Technology Parks of India (STPIs), Advance Authorisation (AA) and Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG)—operate within distinct statutory frameworks.

While the objectives converge on boosting exports and attracting investment, the modalities, benefits, and compliance requirements differ significantly. The following comparative analysis elucidates their legal framework, eligibility, obligations, advantages, limitations, and settled legal positions.

2. Statutory Framework and Nature of Schemes

Scheme

Statutory / Regulatory Basis

Administering Authority

Core Objective

MOOWR, 2019

Section 58 & 65, Customs Act, 1962; CBIC Notification 69/2019-Cus(NT)

Jurisdictional Customs Commissionerate

Deferred customs duty on import of capital goods and raw materials for domestic manufacture.

PLI Scheme

Cabinet-approved sectoral notifications; Implemented under Department of Commerce / concerned line Ministries

Respective line ministries (MeitY, DoT, DPIIT, etc.)

Incentivise incremental sales and domestic value addition.

SEZ Scheme

SEZ Act, 2005 & SEZ Rules, 2006

Ministry of Commerce (Department of Commerce)

Promote export-driven industrial clusters with duty-free environment.

EOU Scheme

Chapter 6 of FTP & Handbook of Procedures

Development Commissioner / SEZ authorities

100% export-oriented units operating in DTA with duty concessions.

STPI Scheme

Policy Resolution of 1986; STPI Society under MeitY

STPI (Ministry of Electronics & IT)

Promote software exports and IT-enabled services.

Advance Authorisation (AA)

Chapter 4 of FTP;  Para 4.03 et seq.

DGFT

Duty-free import of inputs for manufacture of export products.

EPCG Scheme

Chapter 5 of FTP

DGFT

Import of capital goods at zero / concessional duty against export obligation.

3. Eligibility and Coverage

Scheme

Eligible Entities / Sectors

MOOWR

Any manufacturer in India (export-oriented or domestic) importing goods for in-warehouse processing. No minimum investment.

PLI

Sector-specific manufacturers fulfilling threshold investment and incremental turnover criteria.

SEZ

Developer or unit set up in a notified SEZ for export of goods/services.

EOU

Units undertaking to export entire production (subject to permitted DTA sales).

STPI

IT and software development companies engaged in exports of software / ITES.

Advance Authorisation

Exporters requiring import of inputs for manufacturing export goods.

EPCG

Exporters importing capital goods for producing export goods / services.

4. Statutory Fees and Compliances

Scheme

Major Fees / Compliance

MOOWR

No upfront duty; warehouse licensing fee as per Customs; monthly returns; online permission for operations.

PLI

No statutory fee; however, mandatory reporting of sales, investment and value addition; periodic audit certification.

SEZ

One-time application fee; lease rentals; SEZ Unit approval; annual performance reports; bonded-warehouse procedures; compliance with SEZ Rules, 2006.

EOU

Application fee under FTP; customs bonding; annual performance report; B-17 bond execution.

STPI

Registration fee; annual service charges; Softex declarations; periodic returns.

Advance Authorisation

Application fee via DGFT; input–output norms adherence; eBRC submission for redemption.

EPCG

Application fee via DGFT; installation certificate; annual returns on export performance.

5. Export Obligation (EO) and Redemption

Scheme

Export Obligation / Time Frame

Redemption Process

MOOWR

No mandatory EO; duty liability arises only when goods are cleared for home consumption.

Not Applicable but duty liability arises only when goods are cleared for home consumption.

PLI

Incremental sales targets; failure leads to loss of incentive.

Incremental Sales Targets

SEZ

Positive Net Foreign Exchange (NFE) to be maintained over 5-year block; monitored by DC.

Positive Net Foreign Exchange.

EOU

Must achieve positive NFE over 5-year block; DTA sales subject to conditions.

Positive Net Foreign Exchange.

STPI

Similar to EOUs – must maintain positive NFE on exports.

Positive Net Foreign Exchange.

Advance Authorisation

Fulfilling export of resultant product within prescribed period (usually 18 months);

redemption via eBRC submission to DGFT.

EPCG

Fulfil export obligation equivalent to 6 times of duty saved within 6 years;

redemption through DGFT (Redemption / EODC).

6. Benefits / Cost Advantage Analysis

Scheme

Key Benefits

Indicative Cost-Benefit

MOOWR

Deferred customs duty till clearance for home consumption; interest-free deferment; no export obligation; available for both DTA and export units.

Neutral for export and domestic sale; major saving on working capital through duty deferment.

PLI

Direct financial incentive (4%–6% or as notified) on incremental sales.

Substantial cash inflow based on turnover; promotes scale and localisation.

SEZ

Duty-free import/procurement; GST exemption on supplies; income-tax benefits (phased out for new units); simplified customs; single-window clearance.

Strong fiscal incentives; limited domestic market access (treatment of DTA sales).

EOU

Duty-free import of raw materials/capital goods; refund of GST on exports; limited DTA sales allowed.

Similar to SEZ but within DTA; requires continuous compliance and NFE tracking.

STPI

Duty-free imports of hardware; simplified export procedures for software; income-tax benefits for legacy units.

Beneficial for IT sector; administrative ease.

Advance Authorisation

Duty-free import of inputs required for export products.

Duty exemption on proportionate inputs; best for raw-material-intensive industries.

EPCG

Concessional/zero duty import of capital goods against EO.

Reduces capital cost; beneficial for expansion / modernisation projects.

7. Pros and Cons

Scheme

Advantages

Limitations

MOOWR

Simplified; open to all sectors; no EO; perpetual validity; customs supervision minimal.

No remission of duty on eventual domestic sales; no GST exemption; no direct cash incentive.

PLI

Direct incentive; promotes scale and employment.

Strict eligibility; high investment thresholds; sector-specific.

SEZ

Fiscal and procedural autonomy; world-class infrastructure.

Sunset on income-tax benefits; DTA sales treated as imports; withdrawal of incentives under WTO scrutiny.

EOU

Duty exemptions with DTA flexibility; manageable EO.

Complex bonding procedures; gradual rationalisation of benefits vis-à-vis GST regime.

STPI

Tailor-made for IT exporters; minimal customs compliance.

Limited to software/ITES; diminishing fiscal support.

Advance Authorisation

Immediate duty exemption; supports working capital.

EO tracking and strict timelines; non-transferable.

EPCG

Capital cost reduction; long EO period.

Stringent EO; risk of duty recovery with interest/penalty if not fulfilled.

8. Settled Legal Position and Judicial Pronouncements

  1. MOOWR: Judicial and administrative clarifications (e.g., CBIC Circular 34/2020-Cus) confirm that the scheme is export neutral and non-incentive-based; warehoused goods are outside the levy until cleared. Courts have upheld that no interest or duty is payable until ex-bonding for home consumption.

  2. SEZ: The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Customs vs. Tiger Steel Engineering (2020) affirmed that SEZs are treated as foreign territory for customs purposes, eligible for exemptions subject to SEZ Act conditions.

  3. EOU / STPI: Tribunals have held that DTA sales in compliance with FTP conditions do not constitute violation of export obligation; only excess domestic clearances attract duty (e.g., Kiran Spinning Mills v. CCE, 2002 (146) ELT 40 (SC)).

  4. Advance Authorisation / EPCG: DGFT’s powers of regularisation and EO extension are discretionary but bound by FTP norms. In Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2019), Delhi HC emphasised procedural fairness in EO redemption adjudication.

  5. PLI: Being policy-driven, disputes are largely administrative; principles of legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel will apply once investment and eligibility are fulfilled.

9. Comparative Cost–Benefit and Strategic Suitability

Objective

Most Suitable Scheme

Deferred customs duty without export obligation

MOOWR

Cash incentive for incremental domestic manufacturing

PLI

Comprehensive export-oriented industrial enclave

SEZ

Standalone export unit in DTA

EOU / STPI

Duty-free import of inputs

Advance Authorisation

Capital goods at concessional duty

EPCG

Illustrative Cost Impact:

  • A manufacturer importing capital goods worth Rs.10 crore at 7.5% duty would save Rs.75 lakh upfront under MOOWR (duty deferred) or EPCG (duty exempt with EO).

  • Under PLI, if incremental sales of Rs.100 crore attract a 5% incentive, the net incentive equals Rs.5 crore.

  • SEZ/EOU can avail duty-free inputs and GST exemptions translating to ~18–25% cost advantage on input base, subject to EO compliance.

10. Conclusion

Each scheme serves a distinct policy purpose within India’s trade and industrial ecosystem:

  • MOOWR provides duty deferment without export compulsion—ideal for capital-intensive manufacturers.

  • PLI delivers direct fiscal incentive linked to performance, fostering global-scale production.

  • SEZ / EOU / STPI continue as export-promotion regimes offering comprehensive duty exemptions within a bonded framework.

  • Advance Authorisation and EPCG remain transaction-based exemptions tied to export performance.

For legal and strategic evaluation, the choice of scheme must align with a unit’s product profile, market orientation (domestic or export), investment horizon, and compliance capacity. A calibrated combination—such as MOOWR for customs deferment alongside PLI or EPCG—can optimise both fiscal and operational efficiency within the contours of prevailing law.

In essence, the multiplicity of schemes reflects India’s transition from export-driven incentives to production-linked, compliance-based facilitation—anchored in transparency, WTO-compatibility, and sustainable manufacturing growth.

***

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles