Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

ADJUDICATION AND ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY IN GST

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
GST Adjudication Process: Show Cause Notices, Hearing Rights, Proper Officers, Delegation, Valuation, Penalties, and Procedural Safeguards Adjudication under GST is the quasi-judicial process by which departmental authorities determine tax liabilities, classification, valuation, refunds and penalties, initiated by issuance of a clear, unambiguous show cause notice (SCN) that affords the taxpayer hearing rights and respects principles of natural justice. Adjudicating powers rest with 'proper officers' and other authorities as statutorily appointed or delegated, subject to jurisdictional and monetary limits; delegation follows statutory routes. Procedural safeguards include service of orders, opportunity for multiple adjournments for genuine reasons, and consolidation of matters before the authority competent for the highest disputed amount. Judicial review upholds designated officers' powers to summon and inquire when validly appointed. (AI Summary)

Adjudication

‘Adjudication’ has not been defined in the GST laws but according to www. wikipedia. org, “Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants to come to a decision which determines rights and obligation between the parties involved. Three types of dispute are resolved through adjudication:

  • Disputes between private parties, such as individuals or corporations.
  • Disputes between private parties and public officials.
  • Disputes between public officials or public bodies.”

To adjudicate means to decide, determine or to settle. Literally, it means the act of adjudicating, the process of trying and determining a case judicially. The application of the law to the facts and an authoritative declaration of the result.

‘An adjudication in favour of natural rights’. A solemn or deliberate determination by the judicial power: the act of giving judgment.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines the term ‘adjudicate’ so as to mean ‘to settle in the exercise of judicial authority; to determine finally’.

It may be noted that ‘Adjudication’ is the process of deciding an issue relating to tax matters through departmental authorities empowered to determine issues relating to classification, valuation, refund claim, tax or duty payable etc. The department raises demands by way of Show Cause Notices (SCNs) to the assessees when irregularities are observed or suspected.

Adjudication Process

  • Show Cause Notices are issued under provisions of GST Law charging any person for contravention of any provisions of the said Act and rules and/or notifications issued thereunder and penal action is proposed
  • Competent officers of the Department adjudge the case
  • Adjudication is a process involving various steps
  • Hearing of other party/ defence grounds to be considered
  • Issuance of adjudication order
  • Proper service of order

Adjudication pre-supposes issuance of a show cause notice (SCN)-an intimation to show cause, explain or defend the proposed action as mentioned in the SCN. Infact, SCN is the first limb of principle of natural justice i.e., no one should be condemned unheard. SCN should be clear, precise and unambiguous.

Adjudication proceedings in any assessment or penal proceedings is a very important aspect of tax administration. It provides an opportunity to the assessee to be heard and show cause before any action is taken in proceedings relating to him. Issue of show cause notice is a pre-condition to a proper adjudication which is an intimation to assessee of the proposed action by the department. The adjudicating officer adjudicates the show cause notice by considering the reply to show cause notice and other available or produced evidences by the Noticee. A SCN should follow certain principles to be legally sustainable.

Principles of Sound Adjudication

  • Adjudication is an important function of Revenue Officers
  • The authorities are quasi-judicial authorities.
  • Adjudication is a quasi judicial function
  • Duty-bound to justify their existence and carry credibility with the people by inspiring confidence in the adjudication process.
  • No unjustified economic loss is caused on both sides.
  • No injustice to innocent person.
  • Adjudication pre-supposes issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) – an intimation to show cause, explain or defend the proposed action as mentioned in the SCN.
  • Adjudication is a legal process of deciding on issue relating to tax matters through departmental authorities.
  • Adjudication proceeding is an important aspect because it provides an opportunity to the assessee to be heard and show cause before any action is taken against him.
  • Powers of adjudication are subject to jurisdiction and monetary limits for different officers.
  • Adjudication proceedings shall be conducted by observing principles of natural justice.
  • In case of multiple show cause notices, adjudication shall be done by the authority competent to adjudicate the SCN involving highest amount of tax/duty.
  • For genuine reasons, three adjournments should be given as opportunity of hearing for three occasions before passing any order.

Adjudicating Authority [Section 2(4)]

In GST, generally it is the ‘proper officer’ who is adjudicating authority but delegation of powers for the purpose of adjudication can be notified in terms of section 167 of CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, the Commissioner may delegate any power exercisable by any authority or officer which may be exercisable by another authority or officer subject to conditions as per notifications. There may be different adjudicating authorities based upon jurisdiction as also the monetary limits.

 “Adjudicating authority” means any authority, appointed or authorised to pass any order or decision under this Act, but does not include the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, the Revisional Authority, the Authority for Advance Ruling, the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Tribunal and the Authority referred to in sub-section (2) of section 171.

As per section 2(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, ‘adjudicating authority’ means any authority, appointed or authorized to pass any order or decision under this Act, but does not include the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, the Revisional Authority, the Authority for Advance Ruling, the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, the National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Tribunal and the Authority referred to in sub-section (2) of section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.

In Yasho Industries Limited Versus Union Of India - 2021 (6) TMI 918 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT, where petitioner was facing two parallel investigating proceedings, namely the proceedings initiated pursuant to the communication dated 11-11-2020 by the DRI, Kolkata Zonal Unit and the proceedings instituted by the DGGI officer vide summons, invoking section 70 and the petitioner preferred a writ petition seeking directions to the GST Department to issue refund/allow re-credit of Rs. 3 crore paid by the petitioners videForm No. GST DRC-03 and to quash and set aside the Notification No. 14/2017-CT, dated 01.07.2017, in connection with the assignment of functions to the officers as the 'proper officers' in relation to the various functions of the CGST Act and the Rules made thereunder, it was held that under section 70, the power to summon any person whose attendance he considers necessary either to give evidence or to produce the documents in any inquiry in the same manner in the case of a Civil Court under the CPC. As per the definition of 'proper officer' as contained in section 2(91), a 'proper officer' in relation to any function to be performed under the CGST Act means the Commissioner or the officer of the Central Tax, who is assigned that function by the Commissioner in the Board.

It was observed that the respondent officer is an officer of Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) holding the designation of Senior Intelligence Officer, who was appointed as the Central Tax Officer with all the powers under the CGST Act and IGST Act and the Rules made thereunder, as are exercisable by the Central Tax Officers of the corresponding rank of Superintendent as specified in the Notification No. 14 of 2017-CT, dated 01.07.2017 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The respondent being the officer of the Central Tax and the Superintendent under the CGST Act by virtue of the said Notification dated 1-7-2017, he was also assigned the powers of proper officer by the Board videCircular dated 5-7-2017 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (91) of section 2 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST Act. Therefore, the respondent was a proper officer in relation to the function to be performed under the CGST Act as contemplated under section 2(91) of the CGST Act and as such, was entitled to issue summons under section 70 of the CGST Act in connection with the inquiry initiated against the petitioner.

Further, the said Board, namely the Central Board of Excise and Customs in exercise of powers conferred by section 2(91) of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST Act and subject to section 5(2) of the CGST Act has assigned the officers the functions as that of proper officers in relation to the various sections of the CGST Act and the Rules made thereunder, and as such the Superintendent of Central Tax has been assigned the function of section 70(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, there being no delegation of powers by the Commissioner, the provisions contained in section 167 could not be said to have been attracted, nor was there any necessity to issue notification as sought to be submitted by the petitioner.

Thus, it was held that 'Proper officer' in relation to any function to be performed under CGST Act means Commissioner or Officer of Central Tax, who is assigned that function by Commissioner in Central Board of Excise and Customs. Hence, respondent being officer of Central Tax and Superintendent under CGST Act having been assigned powers of proper officer by Board videCircular dated 05.07.2017, was proper officer in relation to function to be performed under CGST Act as contemplated under section 2(91) of the CGST Act, 2017, and as such, was entitled to issue summons under section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017, in connection with inquiry initiated against petitioner for having incorrectly availed benefit of EOU Scheme.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles