Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

Payment of Tax and Interest can be made in installments

Date 06 Feb 2024
Written By
Petitioner Granted Installment Plan for Tax Payment Under Section 80 of CGST Act Due to Financial Hardship
The Calcutta High Court ruled that a petitioner facing financial hardship due to a delay by the Revenue Department in detecting tax dues can pay the tax and interest in ten installments under Section 80 of the CGST Act. Each installment must be paid by the tenth day of each month, and any default will nullify the installment arrangement, allowing the Revenue Department to take legal action. This decision aligns with previous rulings from the Gujarat and Madras High Courts, which also permitted installment payments under similar circumstances. Section 80 allows the Commissioner to extend payment timelines or permit installment payments, subject to conditions. - (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of M/S. NEEL KAMAL & ANR. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, STATE TAX, BARASAT CHARGE & ORS. - 2024 (1) TMI 808 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT held that the payment of tax and interest can be made in 10 installments considering that the Petitioner was facing financial hardship and the Respondent delayed in detecting revenue dues.

Facts:

Neel Kamal (“the Petitioner”) was facing financial hardships due to the Revenue Department's (“the Respondent”) delay in detecting a mistake in revenue dues against the Petitioner.

Hence, the present writ petition was filed by the Petitioner, praying for the payment of tax and interest in installments.

Issue:

Whether payment of tax and interest can be made in installments?

Held:

The Calcutta High Court in M/S. NEEL KAMAL & ANR. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, STATE TAX, BARASAT CHARGE & ORS. - 2024 (1) TMI 808 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Held that, due to the financial hardship of the Petitioner and the delay on the part of the Respondent in detecting such mistake of revenue dues against the Petitioner, the Petitioner can make payment of the tax dues and interest under Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) in question by way of ten equal installments under the provision of Section 80 of the CGST Act.
  • Directed that, each of the installments must be paid within the tenth day of every month and in case of default in any of the installments within the time granted for making payment.  This order of installment will lose its force and the Respondent will be free to proceed against the Petitioners in accordance with the law. Hence, the writ petition was disposed of.

Our Comment:

Earlier, in the case of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in NIRAJKUMAR NARESHKUMAR LAKHYANI (PRO. OF M/S. OM MULTI TRADE) VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2023 (6) TMI 289 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT set aside the order of Adjudicating Authority and allowed the assessee to make payment of tax liability in installments and thereby lifted the provisional attachment of bank account of the assessee.

Further, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/S. EVERYDAY BANKING AND RETAIL ASSETS, REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR. A.A. SIVAKUMAR VERSUS OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , CHENNAI - 2024 (1) TMI 1043 - MADRAS HIGH COURT  held that, the Petitioner asserts that all tax dues were settled and that the Petitioner requires time to pay interest. Thus, the Petitioner was allowed to pay interest in respect of four assessment years vide caution notice because the business of the assessee was to be directed to pay amounts of interest demanded in three equal monthly installments.

Under the provisions of Section 80 of the CGST Act, on the application filed by a taxable person, the Commissioner may give an opportunity to the taxpayer to pay due taxes/demand in installments. However, in case of default by the taxpayer in payment of any one installment on its due date, the whole outstanding balance payable on such date shall become due and payable forthwith and shall, without any further notice being served on the person, be liable for recovery. 

Relevant Provision:

Section 80 of the CGST Act:

Payment of tax and other amount in instalments:

80. On an application filed by a taxable person, the Commissioner may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the time for payment or allow payment of any amount due under this Act, other than the amount due as per the liability self-assessed in any return, by such person in monthly instalments not exceeding twenty four, subject to payment of interest under section 50 and subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed:

Provided that where there is default in payment of any one instalment on its due date, the whole outstanding balance payable on such date shall become due and payable forthwith and shall, without any further notice being served on the person, be liable for recovery.”

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

0 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Recent Articles