Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank account was liable to be lifted in view of the undertaking to pay the disputed tax amount in instalments and the absence of any concluded adjudication.
Analysis: The petitioner invoked writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the provisional attachment of its bank account. The record showed issuance of summons under section 70(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and section 70(1) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, but no adjudication proceedings were pending. The petitioner filed an undertaking to pay the stated amount in 15 equal monthly instalments without prejudice to its rights and contentions in future proceedings. In that factual setting, continued attachment was not warranted.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment was set aside and the bank account was directed to be released; the petition was allowed.