Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsBills
    AMENDMENTS IN THE GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Court Upholds Deduction for Operational Hotel under Section 35AD Despite Administrative Delays
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Landmark Ruling: Leasing Businesses Entitled to Depreciation Benefits
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Court Decision on Convertible Debentures Expenses : Revenue or Capital Expenditure?
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judgement on Feasibility Study Costs on Project Development: Revenue or Capital Expenditure?
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating Section 43B: Supreme Court Decision on Unutilised MODVAT Credit and Sales Tax Recoverable
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Failure to deduct TDS and Disallowance of expenses: Supreme Court Clarifies Retrospective Applicatio...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Deduction of Bad Debts: Supreme Court's Ruling on Section 36 Compliance and alternative claim u/s 37
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Principal-Agent Relationship in Telecom Sector and TDS u/s 194H: A Supreme Court Verdict
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Procedural Compliance vs. Substantive Justice: Balancing Procedural Rigidity and Transitional Hardsh...
    Maximizing Value in Insolvency: NCLAT Upholds CoC's Right to Negotiate Post-Challenge Mechanism
    Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Period for Appeals before NCLAT under IBC in the Digital Age: E-...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Bounds of Tax Law: Supreme Court's Verdict on Section 153-C Assessments
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Delhi High Court's Guiding Light on Post-Search Tax Assessments: Application of Section 153C, po...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating Legal and Procedural Hurdles: A Charitable Institution's Quest for Tax Exemption and Regi...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Objections in Tax Assessments: A Landmark Order
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Invalid Notices and the Importance of Proper Jurisdiction: Lessons from a High-Profile Tax Case
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding Precedent: Supreme Court's Stance on Taxation of Cross-Border Software Payments (Royalty)
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Cross-Border Software Purchase Conundrum: Supreme Court's Clarification on TDS for Non-Resident...
    Ensuring Justice in GST Registration Cancellations: A Landmark High Court Ruling
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsBills
    Show AI Summary
    Regularisation of cess shortfalls where non levy arose from general practice allows government to sanction corrective levy.
    Section 8A empowers the government to regularize cases of non-levy or short-levy of the compensation cess where such under-collection arose from a prevailing general practice, providing an administrative mechanism to treat practice-driven cess shortfalls as regularizable liabilities under the GST compensation framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction eligibility for operational hotels affirmed despite administrative delay in star classification, focusing on substantive compliance.
    The court addressed entitlement to a deduction under Section 35AD(5)(aa) where a hotel began operations and generated income in the relevant year and a timely application for star classification was submitted, but formal certification was delayed due to administrative inspections; the court applied a purposive construction to allow the deduction when substantive operational conditions were satisfied and delay was not the assessee's fault.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Depreciation entitlement for leasing companies where contractual ownership and business use are established, allowing higher depreciation rates.
    A lessor retains entitlement to depreciation where lease terms demonstrate exclusive ownership rights, repossession power, return obligations and inspection rights, and where the asset is used in the course of the lessor's leasing business; actual physical use by the lessor is not required. Leasing activity that functionally equates to hiring can qualify assets for an enhanced rate of depreciation despite registration in the lessee's name.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revenue classification of debenture issuance expenses upheld as revenue expenditure despite later conversion into equity.
    Expenses incurred to issue convertible debentures that are raised to provide working capital are to be treated as revenue expenditure because classification depends on the purpose and usage of the expenditure, and future conversion into shares does not change its revenue character.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of feasibility study costs: expansion-related studies without new assets qualify as revenue expenditure.
    Whether feasibility study expenditures are revenue or capital depends on purpose and benefit: costs to obtain an enduring benefit or create a new capital asset are capital; costs incurred to expand the same business, under unity of control and without creation of new assets, are revenue in nature.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 43B actual-payment requirement prevents deduction of unutilised MODVAT credit and sales tax recoverable balances.
    Section 43B permits deduction only for sums payable as tax, duty, cess or fee that are actually paid in the relevant previous year (or paid before the return due date where a statutory liability existed). Unutilised MODVAT credit is an entitlement to adjust future excise liabilities and not an actual payment; sales tax in a recoverable account is a cost adjustment, not discharge of statutory liability. Because no excise liability existed at the relevant year end, the proviso does not apply and such credits do not meet the Section 43B payment requirement for deduction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective application of curative amendment to TDS deadline clarified, affecting disallowance of expenses under the tax provision.
    The Court addressed whether an amendment extending the time to deposit TDS should be applied retrospectively to govern the operation of a statutory disallowance provision. After reviewing prior amendments, explanatory materials, and precedent on curative measures, the Court characterised the later amendment as curative and directed its retrospective application to the date of insertion of the original provision, thereby affecting the applicability of the disallowance to expenses where TDS was deposited by the extended deadline.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Bad debt deduction criteria clarified under Sections 36 and 37 - stricter substantiation required; capital expenditure excluded.
    Entitlement to a bad debt deduction requires statutory compliance and adequate substantiation; an accounting write off alone does not suffice. The assessee's failure to produce coherent documentary evidence of the nature and terms of the advance, inconsistent characterisation of the payment, and the capital nature of the outflow precluded treatment as a business deduction. The general business expenditure provision does not avail items that are within or expressly excluded by the bad debt framework.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Commission characterization: discounts to franchisees are sales margins, not commission; therefore no TDS obligation under Section 194-H.
    The Court held that the characterisation of receipts as commission or brokerage under Section 194-H requires agency relationships established by control, fiduciary obligations and the ability to bind the principal. Franchisees/distributors who buy prepaid products at discounts, bear commercial risk, determine resale margins and lack pricing control operate independently. Their discounted purchase price and resale margin constitute sale proceeds, not commission for services rendered on behalf of the provider, and thus do not fall within Section 194-H's withholding obligation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural timelines for charitable registration may be treated as directory to mitigate transitional electronic filing hardships and enable merit review.
    The tribunal treated administrative timeline extensions and electronic-filing difficulties as relevant to construing statutory deadlines for charitable approval, regarding the contested filing timelines as directory rather than strictly mandatory where substantive compliance existed, and directed merit-based reconsideration instead of dismissal solely for technical delay.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    CoC negotiation rights preserved after challenge mechanism, allowing revised proposals to maximize corporate value under insolvency framework.
    The CoC retains authority to negotiate with resolution applicants and to call for revisions to resolution plans post-challenge mechanism to maximize corporate value; Regulation 39(1A) is procedural and does not bar such substantive negotiation, and the conclusion of a challenge mechanism does not vest the highest bidder with an automatic right to approval, leaving the CoC's commercial judgment paramount.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation period for IBC appeals runs from e filing date, with time to obtain certified copies excluded.
    The period for filing an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is to be computed from the date of e filing, with allowance for later submission of a physical copy; time taken to obtain certified copies is excluded from the limitation calculation in line with the Limitation Act, producing a framework harmonising tribunal rules, statutory principles, and technological filing practices.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Incriminating evidence requirement for search-based tax assessments: without it, 153 C assessments fail; reassessment under 147/148 remains possible.
    Assessments under Section 153-C require incriminating material discovered during search and seizure; absent such material, those assessments lack evidentiary foundation and may be set aside, though the Revenue may pursue reassessment under alternate provisions if independent legal grounds exist.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Post-search assessment requires reliance on incriminating material discovered during search to validate reassessment of income.
    Post-search assessments must be founded on incriminating material discovered during the search; reassessments cannot be based on material unconnected to search records. Third party assessments require a demonstrable link between the impugned income and the incriminating material within those records. The court reaffirmed precedent distinguishing ordinary reassessment from search triggered reassessment and directed re determination consistent with those legal principles to preserve procedural fairness.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness: clarifying timing for final registration under section 80G prevents denial for pre approval activities.
    The tribunal identified procedural deficiencies in the tax authority's handling of a charity's final registration application, finding that a single short-notice hearing failed to secure adequate opportunity to be heard and underscoring procedural fairness. It further clarified that provisional approval is a predicate to applying for final registration and that activities begun prior to provisional approval do not automatically preclude later final registration, rejecting a restrictive timing construction and directing fresh consideration consistent with those legal principles.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional objection waiver: assessee's participation after notice bars later challenge, remedial reassessment permitted within timeframe.
    The Supreme Court held that an assessee who participates in assessment proceedings after receiving an assessment-process notice without timely challenging the assessing officer's jurisdiction is barred from later disputing that jurisdiction under the statutory limitation. It set aside the High Court's order and directed the assessing officer to complete the assessment within a short prescribed timeframe, with the proviso that the assessee may not plead limitation in that completion process.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdiction in tax assessments: improper issuing authority can invalidate notices and require reissuance by competent authority.
    Jurisdiction in tax assessments was the pivotal issue: the record showed assessment power lay with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), not the subordinate officer who issued the contested notice, rendering that notice issued without jurisdiction. The petition also challenged adherence to principles of natural justice. The court refrained from adjudicating the substantive assessment and demand because those aspects were subject to statutory appeal, distinguishing jurisdictional defects from appealable merits and allowing issuance by the competent authority in conformity with procedural safeguards.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of cross border software payments as royalty reinforced; precedent remains binding despite pending review, so withholding obligations persist.
    Supreme Court reaffirmed that payments to non residents for software are to be treated as royalty for withholding tax purposes, holding that a pending review against an earlier precedent does not suspend that precedent's application; procedural limits on review under the Code of Civil Procedure prevent indefinite postponement of settled law, requiring taxpayers and payors in cross border software transactions to comply with prevailing withholding obligations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterisation of cross-border software dictates TDS obligations based on transaction substance and applicable DTAA.
    Whether payments to non-resident suppliers for computer software constitute royalty and attract TDS depends on the transaction's terms and economic substance; payments reflecting a one-time purchase or transfer of goods do not automatically qualify as royalty. Applicable Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) provisions that are more favourable to the taxpayer govern taxability, and withholding obligations arise only if, after applying treaty benefits and examining substance, the payment is chargeable under domestic law or the DTAA.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness: administrative cancellation of registration demands reasoned decision-making to uphold equality and due process protections.
    Procedural fairness in administrative GST cancellations is the central concern: cancellation of a proprietorship's GST registration for non-filing of returns raises whether authorities considered exceptional personal and pandemic-related circumstances before terminating registration and whether orders contain adequate, contemporaneous reasons so that affected persons can understand and challenge the basis of the action.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Money Laundering

      Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

      9 May, 2023

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

       Section 2 - Definitions.

      Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity

      Preamble 

      Introduction & Overview of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      Origin & Object of PMLA

      Objective is to curb acts of moneylaudering & to punish the offender

      PMLA, 2002 came into force w.e.f 1st July 2005 and has undergone several amendments till now.

       • It extends to whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir

      • Preamble is to prevent money-laundering and provide for confiscation of property derived from, Or involved in money-laundering and to punish those who commit the offence.

       

      Defination of Money Laundering

       Means any act of acquiring untainted property or disguising financial assets

      • According to Section 3 Read with rule 2 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      – “whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money

      Laundering.

      • Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so that they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them.

       

      Process of Money Laundering: Placement, Layering & Integration

      1. Placement (depositing into banks)

      Dirty money being inserted in financial system. The first stage is the physical disposal of cash. The launderer introduces his illegal profits into the financial system. This placement is accomplished by depositing the cash in domestic banks or in other types of formal or informal financial institutions.

      1. Layering (making shell companies causing rotation of money)

      Separates the proceeds from their criminal origin by moving them through a series of financial transactions. The Second stage in money laundering is layering. The launderer engages in a series of conversions or movements of the funds to distance them from their source. Shell companies (i.e. paper companies/bogus companies) serve as front and are registered in offshore havens. They are a common tool in the layering phase.

      1. Integration(acquiring legitimate explanation through investments, loans etc)

      Creating a legitimate explanation for their sources of funds, allowing them to be retained, invested or used, to acquire goods or assets. This is the stage where the funds are returned to the legitimate economy for later extraction. Examples include investing in a company, purchasing real estate, luxury goods, etc. This is the final stage in the process.



       

      Reporting Entity

      To strength the control and achieve the desired goal, the concept of reporting entity is introduced w.e.f. w.e.f. 15-2-2013 to the PMLA, 2002

      Accordingly, clause (wa) to section 2(1) read as:-

      (wa) "reporting entity" means a banking company, financial institution, intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or profession;

      Thus, as per clause (wa) the following persons are made reporting entity under PMLA

        • a banking company (see clause (e))
        • a financial institution (see clause (i))
        • an intermediary (see clause (n))
        •  a person carrying on a designated business or profession (see clause (sa) hereinbelow:)

      Simultaneously, clause (sa) inserted to section 2(1) to define the scope and meaning of “person carrying on designated business or profession" introduced as:

      (sa) "person carrying on designated business or profession" means,-

      (i) a person carrying on activities for playing games of chance for cash or kind, and includes such activities associated with casino;

      (ii) Inspector-General of Registration appointed under section 3 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908.) as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iii) real estate agent, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iv) dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (v) person engaged in safekeeping and administration of cash and liquid securities on behalf of other persons, as may be notified by the Central Government; or

      (vi) person carrying on such other activities as the Central Government may, by notification, so designate, from time to time;


      Notified Persons / Reporting entities u/s 2(1)(sa)

      With the passage to time, Ministry of Finance of the Central Government is notifying more and more category of persons as reporting entity as:

      1.       As per notification dated 24-9-2014 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Looping of reporting entity

        • any person carrying on the business, either on its own behalf or on behalf of other reporting entities,
        • of storing, safeguarding and retrieving the records of the documents mentioned in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 12 of the said Act and the rules made thereunder
        • shall be deemed to be a person carrying on designated business or profession

      2.       Notification No. 2/2015 dated 15-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • any person, licensed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
        • to perform the functions as specified in regulation 3 or regulation 4 or regulation 5 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2002,
        • shall be deemed to be a "person carrying on designated business or profession"

      3.       Notification no. 3/2015 dated 17-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(ii))

        • a Registrar or Sub-Registrar appointed under section 6 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908)
        • as a "person carrying on designated business or profession".

      4.         Notification no. 4/2017 dated 23-8-2017(Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 23-8-2017 to 5-10-2017

        • dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods
        • having a turnover of rupees two crore in a financial year
        • as a person carrying on designated business or profession.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 6-10-2017

      5.       Notification No. 8/2017 dated 15-11-2017 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 15-11-2017 to 27-12-2020

        • ‘real estate agents’ as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (No. 16 of 2016)
        • shall be deemed to be a “person carrying on designated business or profession”

       Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 28-12-2020 

      6.         Notification No. 3/2018 dated 4-5-2018 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        •  the Multi-State Co-operative Society registered under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002)
        • designated as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      7.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

        • the dealers in precious metals, precious stones as persons carrying on designated businesses or professions
        • if they engage in any cash transactions with a customer equal to or above Rupees ten lakhs, carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.

      8.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 28-12-2020 to 28-11-2022

        •  the “Real Estate Agents”, as a person
        • engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs or above,
        • as “persons carrying on designated businesses or professions”.

      This notification has been rescinded vide Notification dated 29-11-2022

      9.         Notification dated 29-11-2022 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 29-11-2022

        •  ‘real estate agents’
        • as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016) and as a person engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs and above,
        • as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      10.         Notification dated 7-3-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • activities when carried out for or on behalf of another natural or legal person in the course of business as an activity for the purposes of said sub sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) exchange between virtual digital assets and fiat currencies;

      (ii) exchange between one or more forms of virtual digital assets;

      (iii) transfer of virtual digital assets;

      (iv) safekeeping or administration of virtual digital assets or instruments enabling control over virtual digital assets; and

      (v) participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and sale of a virtual digital asset.

      Explanation:- For the purposes of this notification “virtual digital asset” shall have the same meaning assigned to it in clause (47A) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      11.       Notification dated 3-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Practicing CA, CS, CWA included in the list as:

        •  the financial transactions carried out by a relevant person on behalf of his client, in the course of his or her profession, in relation to the following activities-

      (i) buying and selling of any immovable property;

      (ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;

      (iii) management of bank, savings or securities accounts;

      (iv) organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies;

      (v) creation, operation or management of companies, limited liability partnerships or trusts, and buying and selling of business entities,

      shall be an activity for the purposes of said sub-section.

      Explanation 1.- For the purposes of this notification ‘relevant person’ includes –

      (i) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (ii) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (iii) an individual who has obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted.

      Explanation 2.- For the purposes of this notification ‘firm’ shall have the same meaning assigned to it in sub-clause (i) of clause (23) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      12.       Notification dated 9-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Specified activities notified - Reporting entity

       Following activities when carried out in the course of business on behalf of or for another person, as the case may be, as an activity for the purposes of said sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) acting as a formation agent of companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (ii) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a director or secretary of a company, a partner of a firm or a similar position in relation to other companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (iii) providing a registered office, business address or accommodation, correspondence or administrative address for a company or a limited liability partnership or a trust;

      (iv) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a trustee of an express trust or performing the equivalent function for another type of trust; and

      (v) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a nominee shareholder for another person.

      Explanation.–For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the following activities shall not be regarded as activity for the purposes of sub-clause (vi) of clause (sa) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Act, namely:-

      (a) any activity that is carried out as part of any agreement of lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of land or building or any space and the consideration is subjected to deduction of income-tax as defined under section 194-I of Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); or

      (b) any activity that is carried out by an employee on behalf of his employer in the course of or in relation to his employment; or

      (c) any activity that is carried out by an advocate, a chartered accountant, cost accountant or company secretary in practice, who is engaged in the formation of a company to the extent of filing a declaration as required under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); or

      (d) any activity of a person which falls within the meaning of an intermediary as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003).

       

      Also see:

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity



      Note:

      The above list is prepared for general information purpose only by TMI, for more information please check the original notifications issued by the Government.

      More notification u/s 2(1)(sa) may follow the list. 

      Customized search

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax